MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » SEAT » Inca » 2002

SEAT Inca MOT Results

Registered in 2002
55.9% pass rate
from 170 tests in 2020
(7.3% better than other 2002 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the SEAT Inca is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Brakes (31% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (44% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.8% fail on Service brake performance (83% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.8% fail on Rbt (87% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 7.6% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (31% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (32% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (61% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (6.5% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (4.6% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake performance not tested (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (55% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (62% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (44% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.59% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 8.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (78% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Load sensing valves (79% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (43% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (7.3% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs (4.3% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.59% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.59% fail on Valves
    • 1.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.59% fail on Pedal
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (13% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim (14% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim (23% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp (8.8% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Electrical equipment (17% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Horn (3.9% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.59% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators (21% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type (21% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (9.2% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (33% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (53% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (53% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (52% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.2% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Main beam tell-tale (22 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.59% fail on Position lamp
  • 16% fail on Suspension (17% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Suspension arms (13% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Ball joint (14% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (34% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.1% fail on Wheel bearings (91% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Springs (4.7% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Coil springs (2.1% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Coil spring (3.2% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.59% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (30% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (64% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.59% fail on Linkage
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (58% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes (31 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers (35% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames (23% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.59% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.59% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.59% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (11% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Transmission (5.9% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts (40% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.3% fail on Joints (41% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system (13% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Seats (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Driver's seat (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Doors (85% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.59% fail on Door condition
    • 0.59% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.59% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.59% fail on Chassis
      • 0.59% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.59% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.59% fail on Carrier
    • 0.59% fail on Body
      • 0.59% fail on Panel
    • 0.59% fail on Undertray
  • 11% fail on Visibility (3.2% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers (7.6% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Washers (26% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.59% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.59% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.8% fail on Steering (31% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Steering linkage components (6.9% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end (6.1% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.5% fail on Steering gear (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Steering rack (93% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Operation
    • 0.59% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.59% fail on Steering play
      • 0.59% fail on Steering rack
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres (46% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Tread depth (62% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition (19% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Size/type
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (11% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (33% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Compression ignition (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3.7% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (40% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.59% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (7.2% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts (11% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas (22% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Condition
    • 0.59% fail on Airbags
      • 0.59% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.59% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.59% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.59% fail on Attachment