MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » SEAT » Inca » 2002

SEAT Inca MOT Results

Registered in 2002
48.5% pass rate
from 134 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the SEAT Inca is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Brakes
    • 19% fail on Brake performance
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 9.7% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 8.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 8.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.75% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal
      • 1.5% fail on Hand lever (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.75% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.75% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.5% fail on Lever
    • 0.75% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.75% fail on Valves
    • 0.75% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.75% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.75% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.75% fail on Other components
  • 27% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.75% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.5% fail on Springs
      • 3.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.7% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.75% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.75% fail on Leaf spring
    • 4.5% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Sub-frame (17 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.75% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.75% fail on Linkage
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.75% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.75% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.75% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.75% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.0% fail on Transmission
      • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.2% fail on Joints
      • 0.75% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.75% fail on Joints
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Body
      • 0.75% fail on Body condition
      • 0.75% fail on Panel
      • 0.75% fail on Other body component
    • 2.2% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Driver's seat (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.75% fail on Doors
      • 0.75% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.75% fail on Door condition
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.75% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.75% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.75% fail on Horn
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.75% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.75% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.75% fail on Windscreen
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 8.2% fail on Tread depth (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
  • 9.0% fail on Steering
    • 5.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.75% fail on Drag link end
    • 3.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.7% fail on Steering rack
  • 9.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 4.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (17 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.75% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.75% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.75% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.5% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 1.5% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.75% fail on Condition
    • 0.75% fail on Attachment