MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » SEAT » Inca » 2002
Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks

SEAT Inca MOT Results

Registered in 2002
46.6% pass rate
from 335 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the SEAT Inca is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.3% fail on Front wheels (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.60% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.30% fail on Brake operation
    • 15% fail on Hydraulic systems (47% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 14% fail on Components (45% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.1% fail on Pipes
        • 4.5% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Valves
        • 0.30% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.30% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
      • 0.30% fail on Leaks
    • 3.0% fail on Parking brake
      • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.60% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.60% fail on Pedal
        • 0.30% fail on Condition
        • 0.30% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.60% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.30% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.30% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.30% fail on Brake slack adjuster
  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.2% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.60% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.1% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Fog lamp (78% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.90% fail on Battery
    • 0.30% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.30% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.30% fail on Tell tale
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 7.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 7.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 6.9% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.30% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.1% fail on Spring mounting
      • 2.1% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.90% fail on Component mounting (82% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.1% fail on Front
      • 2.1% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Macpherson strut (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.60% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.30% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.30% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.30% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.5% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.2% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 7.2% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.60% fail on Size/type
    • 0.30% fail on Valve stem
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust system (67% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on Tank
      • 0.60% fail on Pipe
      • 0.30% fail on System
    • 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.3% fail on Steering
    • 5.4% fail on Steering system
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.4% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.60% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.90% fail on Steering control (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Steering column (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.60% fail on Power steering
      • 0.60% fail on Other components
  • 5.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.1% fail on Doors
      • 1.5% fail on Passengers front (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Drivers
    • 1.2% fail on Body condition (70% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Seats
      • 1.2% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.30% fail on Body security
  • 3.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment
    • 0.60% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.60% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment