MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » SEAT » Inca » 2002
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

SEAT Inca MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.2% pass rate
from 223 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the SEAT Inca is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.0% fail on Service brake performance (78% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 9.0% fail on Rbt (81% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 7.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 7.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.45% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Valves (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Brake fluid
    • 2.7% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.45% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.45% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.45% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.45% fail on Cable
    • 2.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.3% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Pedal
    • 0.90% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.90% fail on Lever
    • 0.45% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.45% fail on Valves
    • 0.45% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.45% fail on Other components
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.90% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.90% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.90% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.90% fail on Horn
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.90% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.90% fail on Switch
    • 0.90% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.1% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Transmission
      • 7.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 7.2% fail on Joints
    • 3.6% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Front passenger's door (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.45% fail on Door condition
      • 0.45% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.45% fail on Catch
    • 2.2% fail on Spare wheel (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Carrier (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.90% fail on System
      • 0.45% fail on Tank
    • 0.90% fail on Chassis
      • 0.90% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.90% fail on Seats
      • 0.90% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.90% fail on Undertray (20 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.45% fail on Body
      • 0.45% fail on Other body component
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 3.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.0% fail on Springs
      • 2.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.7% fail on Coil spring
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.7% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes (24 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (63% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.90% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.45% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.90% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.45% fail on Window
    • 0.90% fail on View to rear
      • 0.90% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.45% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.5% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
  • 8.1% fail on Steering
    • 4.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.45% fail on Drag link end
    • 3.6% fail on Steering gear (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Steering rack (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Steering column
  • 4.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
    • 0.90% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.90% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.45% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.45% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.45% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.45% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.45% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.90% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.90% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.8% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plates