MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » SEAT » Inca » 2003
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

SEAT Inca MOT Results

Registered in 2003
38.9% pass rate
from 190 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the SEAT Inca is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Brakes (62% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 25% fail on Brake performance (96% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 19% fail on Front wheels (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 13% fail on Rear wheels (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 17% fail on Hydraulic systems (67% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 14% fail on Components
        • 7.9% fail on Pipes
        • 6.3% fail on Hoses (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Reservoirs (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Valves
      • 2.1% fail on Operation (11 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.53% fail on Leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical components
      • 1.1% fail on Lever (30 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Cable
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.53% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.53% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.53% fail on Pedal
        • 0.53% fail on Condition
    • 0.53% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
      • 0.53% fail on Operation
    • 0.53% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.53% fail on Components
        • 0.53% fail on Servos
    • 0.53% fail on Restricted movement
  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Horn
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.1% fail on Lamp
    • 0.53% fail on Battery
    • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.53% fail on Switch
    • 0.53% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 31% fail on Suspension
    • 8.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 7.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.53% fail on Attachment
    • 7.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.3% fail on Subframe mounting (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.53% fail on Spring mounting
    • 5.3% fail on Coil springs
      • 5.3% fail on Condition
    • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.53% fail on Couplings
    • 4.2% fail on Macpherson strut (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.2% fail on Front
      • 1.1% fail on Rear
    • 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.53% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.53% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 2.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.5% fail on Steering
    • 8.9% fail on Steering system
      • 4.7% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.53% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.53% fail on Steering control
      • 0.53% fail on Steering column
  • 8.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.1% fail on Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.53% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.53% fail on System
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Size/type
  • 7.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Condition
    • 0.53% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.53% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 6.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.6% fail on Doors
      • 1.6% fail on Drivers (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers front
    • 1.6% fail on Body condition
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 1.1% fail on Drivers
    • 1.1% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.53% fail on Chassis
  • 4.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
  • 0.53% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.53% fail on Attachment