MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » SEAT » Inca » 2003

SEAT Inca MOT Results

Registered in 2003
50.0% pass rate
from 76 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the SEAT Inca is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Brakes
    • 21% fail on Brake performance
      • 16% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (190% worse than other 2003 vans)
          • 13% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.3% fail on Decelerometer
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 1.3% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 16% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (200% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 16% fail on Rbt (sp) (200% worse than other 2003 vans)
          • 13% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 9.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 9.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 5.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 1.3% fail on Decelerometer
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 1.3% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 9.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.9% fail on Flexible brake hoses (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal
      • 1.3% fail on Hand lever
    • 2.6% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (11 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (29 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 1.3% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 12% fail on Headlamp aim (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.6% fail on Horn
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 5.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 5.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Suspension arm
    • 5.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.3% fail on Transmission
      • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.3% fail on Joints
    • 3.9% fail on Chassis
      • 3.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Tank
    • 1.3% fail on Engine mounting
      • 1.3% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 1.3% fail on Doors
      • 1.3% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition
    • 1.3% fail on Seats
      • 1.3% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 12% fail on Steering
    • 7.9% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Other components
        • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage
      • 1.3% fail on Locking devices
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Bonnet (12 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.3% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Condition
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Size/type (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
  • 7.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (20 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.3% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 1.3% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
  • 5.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp