MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » SEAT » Inca » 2003

SEAT Inca MOT Results

Registered in 2003
42.9% pass rate
from 112 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the SEAT Inca is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes
    • 19% fail on Brake performance
      • 12% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2003 vans)
          • 12% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 8.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 8.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 8.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 8.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt
          • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 8.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.6% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.8% fail on Lever
    • 1.8% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.89% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.89% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.89% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.89% fail on Valves
    • 0.89% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.89% fail on Other components
    • 0.89% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.89% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.89% fail on Brake discs
  • 26% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint
    • 5.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 5.4% fail on Springs
      • 5.4% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.4% fail on Coil spring
    • 4.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.89% fail on Linkage
    • 4.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.6% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.89% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.89% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.89% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.89% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.89% fail on Horn
    • 0.89% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.89% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.89% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 15% fail on Visibility
    • 9.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.8% fail on View to rear
      • 1.8% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.89% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.89% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.89% fail on Windscreen
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.0% fail on Transmission
      • 8.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 8.0% fail on Joints
    • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Doors
      • 1.8% fail on Front passenger's door (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.89% fail on Door condition
    • 1.8% fail on Seats
      • 1.8% fail on Driver's seat (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.89% fail on Chassis
      • 0.89% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.89% fail on Body
      • 0.89% fail on Other body component
    • 0.89% fail on Floor
    • 0.89% fail on Undertray
  • 9.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.9% fail on Compression ignition (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (23 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.89% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.89% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.89% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 8.0% fail on Steering
    • 7.1% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
  • 3.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.89% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.89% fail on Registration plates