Toyota Dyna MOT Results

Registered in 2002
57.3% pass rate
from 117 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 11% fail on Fog lamp (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.1% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.85% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.85% fail on Front lamps
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Battery
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.85% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.85% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.85% fail on Lamp
    • 0.85% fail on Horn
  • 15% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.5% fail on Washers
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.7% fail on Windscreen
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 3.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.85% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.85% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.6% fail on Restricted movement (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (83% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Components (83% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Pipes
        • 0.85% fail on Valves
    • 0.85% fail on ABS
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 10% fail on Seat belts (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 10% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 9.4% fail on Suspension (62% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.85% fail on Condition
      • 0.85% fail on Attachment
    • 2.6% fail on Leaf springs
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.85% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.85% fail on Front
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
  • 4.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.4% fail on Body condition
    • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis
  • 3.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.7% fail on Cap
  • 1.7% fail on Steering
    • 0.85% fail on Steering control
      • 0.85% fail on Steering column
      • 0.85% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.85% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.85% fail on Steering system
      • 0.85% fail on Track rod end