Toyota Dyna MOT Results
Registered in 200257.3% pass rate
from 117 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(170% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 11% fail on Fog lamp (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.85% fail on All position lamps
- 0.85% fail on Front lamps
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.6% fail on Battery
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.85% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.85% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.85% fail on Lamp
- 0.85% fail on Horn
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(170% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
15% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.5% fail on Washers
- 6.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Mirrors
- 1.7% fail on Windscreen
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.1% fail on Front wheels
- 5.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.4% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.6% fail on Brake imbalance
-
3.4% fail on
Hub components
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.85% fail on Brake drums
- 0.85% fail on Brake calipers
- 2.6% fail on Restricted movement (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(83% better than other 2002 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Components
(83% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.85% fail on Pipes
- 0.85% fail on Valves
-
1.7% fail on
Components
(83% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.85% fail on ABS
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(110% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
10% fail on
Seat belts
(150% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 10% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
10% fail on
Seat belts
(150% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
9.4% fail on
Suspension
(62% better than other 2002 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.85% fail on Condition
- 0.85% fail on Attachment
-
2.6% fail on
Leaf springs
- 2.6% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.6% fail on Condition
-
0.85% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.85% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.85% fail on Front
-
5.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
6.0% fail on
Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth
- 3.4% fail on Condition
-
4.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 3.4% fail on Body condition
-
1.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.7% fail on Chassis
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.7% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.7% fail on Cap
-
1.7% fail on
Steering
-
0.85% fail on
Steering control
- 0.85% fail on Steering column
-
0.85% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.85% fail on Universal joint
-
0.85% fail on
Steering system
- 0.85% fail on Track rod end
-
0.85% fail on
Steering control