Toyota Dyna MOT Results

Registered in 2002
66.3% pass rate
from 92 tests in 2020
(30% better than other 2002 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (20% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (73% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp (6.4% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (49% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (45% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators (42% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type (42% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (38% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
  • 14% fail on Brakes (25% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (0.66% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Service brake performance (80% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.7% fail on Rbt (84% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 8.7% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (9.9% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (11% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance (44% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (25% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4.0% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (2.1% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.1% fail on Cable
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (14% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system (79% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Chassis (10% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Chassis condition (11% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (23% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (22% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.1% fail on Floor
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's seat
    • 1.1% fail on Cabs
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.8% fail on Visibility (4.6% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers (20% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on View to rear (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
  • 7.6% fail on Suspension (62% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (4.0% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms (46% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint (30% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.2% fail on Springs (36% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Leaf springs (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Anchor bracket (43 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 5.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (23% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Seat belts (64% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 2.2% fail on Steering (68% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components (51% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (55% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.1% fail on Tyres
    • 1.1% fail on Condition