MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Dyna » 2004
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Toyota Dyna MOT Results

Registered in 2004
57.6% pass rate
from 165 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Fog lamp (170% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Switch
    • 8.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Front lamps
    • 7.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.61% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.61% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.61% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.61% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.61% fail on Switch
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 7.3% fail on Front wheels (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (79% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Leaks
      • 0.61% fail on Components
        • 0.61% fail on Pipes
    • 1.2% fail on ABS
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.61% fail on Brake discs
  • 13% fail on Suspension (49% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 6.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.61% fail on Attachment
    • 4.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 4.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.2% fail on Leaf springs
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.61% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.61% fail on Front
    • 0.61% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 9.7% fail on Tyres
    • 7.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.61% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.61% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 6.1% fail on Body condition
    • 1.8% fail on Body security (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
  • 5.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.61% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.61% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 5.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions
    • 0.61% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.61% fail on Cap
  • 4.8% fail on Steering
    • 4.2% fail on Steering system
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Free play
        • 1.2% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.61% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.61% fail on Other components
        • 0.61% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.61% fail on Steering control
      • 0.61% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.61% fail on Universal joint
  • 2.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate