Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Dyna MOT Results

Registered in 2004
56.9% pass rate
from 174 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.57% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.57% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.57% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.57% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.57% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.57% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.57% fail on Switch
    • 0.57% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 7.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 6.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.9% fail on Rbt
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt
          • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.57% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.57% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (80% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.57% fail on Pedal
    • 0.57% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 8.0% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage
    • 2.3% fail on Springs
      • 2.3% fail on Leaf springs
        • 2.3% fail on Leaf spring (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms (75% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.57% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.57% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.4% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Mounting fixings (23 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Panel
      • 1.1% fail on Other body component
    • 2.3% fail on Cabs (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Steps (23 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.57% fail on Pipe
    • 1.1% fail on Floor (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Chassis
      • 0.57% fail on Chassis condition
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 7.5% fail on Washers
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on View to rear
      • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.57% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.57% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 6.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
  • 8.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 8.6% fail on Seat belts (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
  • 6.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 4.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.57% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering coupling (29 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Universal joint (32 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.57% fail on Steering column
  • 1.7% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates