MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Dyna » 2005
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Dyna MOT Results

Registered in 2005
56.5% pass rate
from 191 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 9.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.52% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.1% fail on Horn
      • 0.52% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.52% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.52% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Visibility (60% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Washers
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on View to rear
      • 2.1% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.6% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.6% fail on Windscreen
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 8.4% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Springs
      • 3.1% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Leaf spring (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms (84% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.52% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 9.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.52% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.52% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.52% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt
          • 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.52% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.52% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.52% fail on Cable
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.52% fail on Pedal
    • 0.52% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Body
      • 1.0% fail on Other body component
      • 0.52% fail on Body condition
      • 0.52% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.52% fail on Panel
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.52% fail on Tank
      • 0.52% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.0% fail on Seats
      • 1.0% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.52% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.52% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.52% fail on Chassis
      • 0.52% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.52% fail on Doors
      • 0.52% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.52% fail on Hinge
    • 0.52% fail on Cabs
      • 0.52% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
  • 4.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.52% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
  • 2.6% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.52% fail on Steering play
      • 0.52% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.52% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.52% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment