MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Dyna » 2006
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Toyota Dyna MOT Results

Registered in 2006
49.3% pass rate
from 221 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 11% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.2% fail on Rear lamps (160% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Front lamps
    • 9.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.45% fail on Switch
    • 0.45% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.45% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.45% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.45% fail on Switch
    • 0.45% fail on Horn
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 10.0% fail on Leaf springs (8 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 10.0% fail on Condition (17 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 10.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 6.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.8% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Shock absorbers (180% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.8% fail on Front
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.45% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.45% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.45% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.45% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 3.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.2% fail on Components
        • 3.2% fail on Pipes
        • 0.90% fail on Valves
    • 2.7% fail on ABS
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.45% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.45% fail on Pedal
        • 0.45% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.45% fail on Cable
  • 12% fail on Tyres
    • 5.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Size/type
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.4% fail on Washers
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.90% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.5% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Tank (14 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Cap (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.90% fail on Emissions
  • 5.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Steering system
      • 0.90% fail on Free play
        • 0.90% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.90% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.90% fail on Steering arm (6 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.45% fail on Other components
        • 0.45% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 2.3% fail on Steering control (16 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Steering coupling (37 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Universal joint (37 times worse than other 2006 vans)
  • 5.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.7% fail on Body condition
    • 1.8% fail on Body security (18 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Drivers (8 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.45% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.45% fail on Chassis
  • 3.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
  • 0.90% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.90% fail on Attachment
  • 0.45% fail on Towbars
    • 0.45% fail on Towbar
  • 0.45% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.45% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.45% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp