Toyota Dyna MOT Results
Registered in 200855.5% pass rate
from 281 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
8.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.4% fail on Rear lamps (170% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Front lamps
- 7.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(160% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Fog lamp (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Tell tale
- 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.5% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.71% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.71% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.71% fail on Horn
- 0.36% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.36% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.36% fail on Headlamp
- 0.36% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.36% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.36% fail on Lamp
-
19% fail on
Suspension
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 7.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.36% fail on Condition
- 0.36% fail on Attachment
- 0.36% fail on Linkage condition
-
5.7% fail on
Leaf springs
(2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.71% fail on Securing bolts (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
4.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
(200% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.71% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.71% fail on Front
- 0.71% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.36% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
- 6.8% fail on Front wheels (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 4.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.8% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.1% fail on
Components
- 1.1% fail on Valves (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.71% fail on Pipes (80% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Hoses
- 0.36% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.36% fail on Leaks
-
2.1% fail on
Components
- 1.8% fail on ABS
-
1.8% fail on
Hub components
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
-
0.36% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.36% fail on Condition
-
0.36% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.36% fail on
Pedal
- 0.36% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.36% fail on
Pedal
- 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(48% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Washers
- 6.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.5% fail on Mirrors
- 0.71% fail on Windscreen
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.6% fail on Tread depth
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.4% fail on Tank (11 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.71% fail on Cap
-
4.3% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Registration plate (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.8% fail on Body condition
- 0.36% fail on Body security
-
0.36% fail on
Seats
- 0.36% fail on Drivers
-
1.1% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.1% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Steering
- 0.36% fail on Locking devices
-
0.36% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.36% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.36% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.36% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems