MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Dyna » 2008

Toyota Dyna MOT Results

Registered in 2008
56.9% pass rate
from 260 tests in 2020
(6.9% better than other 2008 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (5.2% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 8.8% fail on Stop lamp (33% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (190% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Switch
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (23% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (0.0071% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (8.1% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators (4.9% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type (4.9% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (36% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment (21% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Horn (0.71% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.38% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.38% fail on Position lamp
  • 18% fail on Brakes (8.6% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (34% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 8.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 6.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (8 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (11% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (12% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (90% worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (68% worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Plate brake tester (18 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (21 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (29% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (27% better than other 2008 vans)
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (18% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (27% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (59% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (49% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (62% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.38% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.38% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.38% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.38% fail on Pedal
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
    • 0.38% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.38% fail on Other braking system component
  • 15% fail on Visibility (64% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Washers (61% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers (31% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on View to rear (130% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Mirrors (130% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition of glass (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Windscreen (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
  • 13% fail on Suspension (28% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 9.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (31% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Springs (43% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Leaf springs (25% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Leaf spring (67% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (61% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint (40% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.77% fail on Wheel bearings (57% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Other suspension component (15% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint (82% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.38% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres (38% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth (27% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Condition (79% worse than other 2008 vans)
  • 7.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (20% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Body (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Mounting fixings (56 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Other body component (130% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Body condition
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (81% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (83% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system (170% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Tank
    • 0.38% fail on Chassis
      • 0.38% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.38% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.38% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.38% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.38% fail on Carrier
    • 0.38% fail on Seats
      • 0.38% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.38% fail on Cabs
      • 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (11% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (17% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition (17% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (47% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition (21% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (11% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Fluid leaks (17% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Engine oil leaks (52% worse than other 2008 vans)
  • 2.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (66% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Steering linkage components (55% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end (52% better than other 2008 vans)
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (37% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts (4.5% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (80% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Condition