Toyota Dyna MOT Results
Registered in 201056.0% pass rate
from 168 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
10% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 10% fail on Fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Tell tale
- 9.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
8.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.0% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Front lamps
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.0% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.2% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.60% fail on Battery
- 0.60% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.60% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.60% fail on Headlamp
-
18% fail on
Suspension
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(150% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 7.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.60% fail on Attachment
-
8.9% fail on
Leaf springs
(10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 7.1% fail on Condition (18 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Pins and bushes
(6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Anchor (26 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Securing bolts
-
4.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.60% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.60% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.60% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.60% fail on Front
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(150% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
7.7% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.2% fail on Front wheels (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Brake imbalance
-
4.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.2% fail on
Components
- 3.6% fail on Pipes
- 0.60% fail on Valves
- 0.60% fail on Leaks
-
4.2% fail on
Components
-
4.8% fail on
Hub components
- 4.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.60% fail on Brake drums
- 0.60% fail on Brake discs
- 1.8% fail on ABS
- 0.60% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.60% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.60% fail on Condition
-
0.60% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.60% fail on
Pedal
- 0.60% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.60% fail on
Pedal
-
7.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.9% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.2% fail on Washers
- 3.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Mirrors
-
7.7% fail on
Tyres
- 6.5% fail on Tread depth
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
4.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(180% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Fuel system
(4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Tank (15 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Cap (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.60% fail on System
- 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Fuel system
(4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate
-
1.8% fail on
Road Wheels
(7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Attachment (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
-
0.60% fail on
Steering control
-
0.60% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.60% fail on Universal joint
-
0.60% fail on
Steering coupling
-
0.60% fail on
Steering system
- 0.60% fail on Steering arm
-
0.60% fail on
Steering control
-
0.60% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.60% fail on Body security