Toyota Dyna MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.0% pass rate
from 165 tests in 2020
(2.0% worse than other 2010 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (4.9% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (12% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim (17% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim (27% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment (7.6% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.61% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.61% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.61% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.61% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 17% fail on Brakes (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (66% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.61% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 6.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (35% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (6.1% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads (5.3% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.61% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.61% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 15% fail on Suspension (2.0% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (47% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 7.9% fail on Springs (93% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Leaf spring (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 0.61% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.61% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.61% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.61% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 9.7% fail on Visibility (20% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Washers (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers (11% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on View to rear (58% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Mirrors (61% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 8.5% fail on Tyres (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Tread depth (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Condition (20% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 6.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (19% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (16% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Compression ignition (14% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 2.4% fail on Spark ignition (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.61% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 4.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Body (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Body condition
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (6.9% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Chassis
      • 0.61% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.61% fail on Bumpers
  • 3.6% fail on Steering (27% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Steering linkage components (26% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end (21% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Steering column
    • 0.61% fail on Steering play
      • 0.61% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.8% fail on Identification of the vehicle (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plates (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 1.8% fail on Road Wheels (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)