MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Ace » 2005
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 2005
63.1% pass rate
from 1,686 tests in 2020
(26% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (19% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.059% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
      • 0.42% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (46% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (46% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (45% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (68% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.83% fail on Direction indicators (76% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Individual direction indicators (70% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.059% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.18% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.12% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.12% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Suspension (45% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage ball joints (91% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.059% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.059% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (30% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (84% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.059% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.059% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.77% fail on Wheel bearings (63% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Shock absorbers (60% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component (73% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.059% fail on Axles
      • 0.059% fail on Axle
    • 0.059% fail on Springs
      • 0.059% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Brakes (41% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance (68% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (57% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (66% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.059% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (49% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (49% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.95% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake performance (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (81% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (78% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.059% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (53% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.18% fail on Brake discs and drums (86% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Brake discs (90% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.18% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.12% fail on Cable
        • 0.059% fail on Pivot
    • 1.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.59% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.42% fail on Pedal
      • 0.18% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.47% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.36% fail on Lever
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.30% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.059% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.059% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility (29% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.53% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear (72% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors (71% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.059% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (45% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.059% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.30% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.059% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.059% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.18% fail on Fluid leaks (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.059% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (37% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth (35% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.059% fail on Size/type
  • 2.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (78% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Integral vehicle structure (60% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (59% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Chassis (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Chassis condition (78% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Tank
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.24% fail on Body (73% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Panel
      • 0.059% fail on Other body component
    • 0.18% fail on Transmission (96% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts (97% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints (97% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.059% fail on Joints
    • 0.18% fail on Doors (75% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.059% fail on Door condition
        • 0.059% fail on Hinge
      • 0.059% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.059% fail on Door condition
    • 0.12% fail on Exhaust system (97% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
      • 0.059% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.059% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.12% fail on Load security
      • 0.059% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.059% fail on Tailgate condition
      • 0.059% fail on Loading door
    • 0.12% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.12% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.059% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.059% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.059% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.059% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.059% fail on Seats
      • 0.059% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.059% fail on Cabs
      • 0.059% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (66% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (46% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
      • 0.059% fail on Requirements
    • 0.059% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.71% fail on Steering (89% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Steering linkage components (92% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.059% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
      • 0.059% fail on Operation
      • 0.059% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Steering play
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.059% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.059% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.65% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
  • 0.059% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.059% fail on Anchorages