MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Ace » 2005

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 2005
65.2% pass rate
from 1,613 tests in 2021
(30% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (60% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (66% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (66% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.99% fail on Individual direction indicators (61% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.62% fail on Horn
      • 0.50% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.062% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.37% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.37% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.062% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Suspension (37% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.062% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.062% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.062% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms (74% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.68% fail on Wheel bearings (65% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Springs (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.062% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.062% fail on Mounting
    • 0.25% fail on Axles
      • 0.12% fail on Axle
      • 0.12% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames (83% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component (84% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
  • 10.0% fail on Brakes (44% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance (65% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (61% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (63% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (53% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (54% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance (52% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake performance (60% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.062% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (80% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (81% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.062% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.87% fail on Mechanical brake components (72% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Brake linings and pads (52% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.81% fail on Brake pads (51% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake discs and drums (90% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Brake discs (90% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.43% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.25% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.062% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.43% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.43% fail on Lever
    • 0.19% fail on Load sensing valves (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.7% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.31% fail on View to rear
      • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.19% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.062% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.062% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (61% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (49% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (48% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.87% fail on Exhaust system (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.50% fail on Tank
      • 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.12% fail on System
      • 0.062% fail on Pipe
    • 0.74% fail on Body
      • 0.37% fail on Other body component
      • 0.31% fail on Panel
      • 0.062% fail on Body condition
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.19% fail on Towbar
      • 0.12% fail on Towbar condition (16 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.062% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.19% fail on Transmission (96% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts (97% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints (97% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.062% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.062% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.12% fail on Doors (84% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.062% fail on Door condition
        • 0.062% fail on Hinge
    • 0.12% fail on Floor
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.12% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.12% fail on Boot lid condition (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres (32% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (29% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.31% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.25% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.062% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.062% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.19% fail on Fluid leaks (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks (74% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (68% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (47% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Prescribed areas (68% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
      • 0.19% fail on Requirements
  • 0.93% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Track rod end (95% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.062% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.062% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.062% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.25% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.062% fail on Operation
      • 0.062% fail on Rams
    • 0.19% fail on Steering gear (84% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.062% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.87% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.87% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.062% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.062% fail on Attachment