MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Ace » 2010
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 2010
70.9% pass rate
from 777 tests in 2017
(27% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (29% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Position lamps (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.39% fail on Rear lamps (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (57% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.51% fail on Individual lamps (71% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.64% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.39% fail on Battery
    • 0.26% fail on Horn
    • 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 7.7% fail on Brakes (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.51% fail on Rear wheels (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.9% fail on Components
        • 1.7% fail on Pipes
        • 0.26% fail on Hoses
        • 0.26% fail on Valves
    • 1.7% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.90% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.90% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.51% fail on Pedal
        • 0.51% fail on Anti-slip
  • 7.3% fail on Suspension (46% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (70% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.64% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment
    • 0.26% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.26% fail on Front
    • 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.13% fail on Component mounting
  • 6.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (58% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 1.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.51% fail on Emissions (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on System
  • 0.90% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.90% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.39% fail on Steering (90% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Steering system (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.39% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.39% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
  • 0.13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Emergency exits
  • 0.13% fail on Driving Controls and Speed Limiters
    • 0.13% fail on Speed limiter
    • 0.13% fail on Speed limiter plate