Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results
Registered in 201070.0% pass rate
from 977 tests in 2021
(35% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(40% better than other 2010 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (54% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(42% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(57% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
(57% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.41% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
(57% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamps
(71% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.0% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.61% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Horn
- 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.10% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.10% fail on Position lamp
-
0.10% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
8.1% fail on
Brakes
(45% better than other 2010 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.8% fail on
Brake performance
(76% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 0.82% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.10% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
-
0.61% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.61% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.61% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.20% fail on
Parking brake performance
(89% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt
(89% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Rbt
(89% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(96% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Rbt (sp) (96% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
1.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(70% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(63% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads (62% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.31% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(81% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Brake discs (81% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(63% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.51% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.51% fail on Pedal
-
0.51% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.51% fail on Lever
- 0.41% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.31% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.10% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.10% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.10% fail on Other components
-
8.0% fail on
Suspension
(53% better than other 2010 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (80% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joints (91% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Ball joint
- 0.10% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.10% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(79% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint (65% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.82% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.41% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.31% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.20% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
-
0.10% fail on
Springs
- 0.10% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
5.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
6.1% fail on
Visibility
(29% better than other 2010 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
View to rear
- 0.20% fail on Mirrors
-
0.10% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.10% fail on Windscreen
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.10% fail on Size/type
-
3.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(37% better than other 2010 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(39% better than other 2010 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 2.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.41% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.31% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.20% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.1% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.41% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.10% fail on Other leaks
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(39% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(73% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.82% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.41% fail on
Transmission
(90% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Drive shafts
(94% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Joints (94% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.20% fail on Prop shaft
-
0.20% fail on
Drive shafts
(94% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.31% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.20% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.10% fail on Pipe
-
0.20% fail on
Chassis
- 0.20% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.10% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.10% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.10% fail on Bumpers
-
0.10% fail on
Body
- 0.10% fail on Panel
- 0.10% fail on Floor
-
0.10% fail on
Seats
- 0.10% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.10% fail on
Cabs
- 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(58% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.92% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.41% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on Requirements
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
- 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.10% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.92% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.41% fail on
Steering
(92% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.31% fail on
Steering linkage components
(93% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.10% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.10% fail on Steering rack
-
0.31% fail on
Steering linkage components
(93% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.20% fail on Registration plates
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
-
0.10% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.10% fail on Anchorages