Vauxhall Astravan MOT Results

Registered in 2002
37.9% pass rate
from 132 tests in 2020
(27% worse than other 2002 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Astravan is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Suspension (48% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 12% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 11% fail on Coil springs (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 11% fail on Coil spring (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.76% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 2.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.76% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.5% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.76% fail on Axles
      • 0.76% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.76% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.76% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.5% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.5% fail on Horn
      • 0.76% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.76% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.76% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.76% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 9.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 6.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.5% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.5% fail on Cable
    • 0.76% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.76% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.76% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.76% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.76% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 17% fail on Visibility
    • 9.1% fail on Wipers
    • 7.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.5% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.76% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.76% fail on View to rear
      • 0.76% fail on Mirrors
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.1% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on System (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Joints
    • 0.76% fail on Chassis
      • 0.76% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.76% fail on Bumpers
  • 9.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.76% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.76% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.76% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.76% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.76% fail on Other leaks
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.76% fail on Size/type
  • 5.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.5% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.76% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.76% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates