Vauxhall Combo MOT Results

Registered in 2002
40.6% pass rate
from 3,531 tests in 2017
(15% worse than other 2002 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Combo is unusually good or bad.

  • 37% fail on Suspension (49% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 10% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
    • 13% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 12% fail on Front drive shafts (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 12% fail on Constant velocity joints (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
    • 12% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 12% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Location
    • 6.4% fail on Suspension arms (26% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (28% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
      • 0.028% fail on Condition
    • 4.5% fail on Wheel bearings (75% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Rear (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Front (55% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Shock absorbers (89% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Condition (89% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas (61% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Component mounting (47% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Subframe mounting (61% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Spring mounting (95% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints (31% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Attachment
    • 0.51% fail on Tie bars/rods (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.057% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
    • 0.028% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 35% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (14% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.7% fail on Stop lamp (20% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Headlamp aim (32% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.8% fail on Front lamps (18% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear lamps (46% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamps (74% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Switch
      • 0.028% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.028% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.028% fail on Matched pair
    • 5.7% fail on Direction indicators (37% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Flashing type (37% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Individual lamps (74% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.45% fail on Side repeaters (62% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Switch
        • 0.028% fail on Tell tales
    • 3.9% fail on Battery (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (50% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Fog lamp (50% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Horn
    • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Hazard warning (68% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Switch (67% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.057% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.028% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 26% fail on Brakes (17% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (21% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Parking brake performance (48% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Rear wheels (63% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.88% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems (30% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 13% fail on Components (31% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 9.6% fail on Pipes (55% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Valves
        • 0.99% fail on Hoses
        • 0.057% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.057% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.028% fail on Servos
      • 0.37% fail on Leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.85% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.057% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.028% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 2.4% fail on Parking brake (59% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Condition (57% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Fitment (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.99% fail on Pedal
        • 0.91% fail on Anti-slip (61% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.45% fail on Cable
      • 0.028% fail on Lever
    • 0.31% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.057% fail on Components
        • 0.057% fail on Servos (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Operation
      • 0.028% fail on Leaks
    • 0.11% fail on ABS
    • 0.085% fail on Prescribed areas (80% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.028% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.028% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.028% fail on Locking devices
  • 15% fail on Driver's view of the road (22% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Wipers (17% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Washers (38% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Windscreen (44% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
  • 13% fail on Tyres (63% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Tread depth (52% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Condition (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Size/type (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 13% fail on Steering (71% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 12% fail on Steering system (78% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Track rod end (52% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Steering rack (88% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Free play (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Steering rack (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint (74% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Steering arm (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
        • 0.14% fail on Steering pivot point
      • 0.028% fail on Lock stop
    • 1.2% fail on Steering control (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Steering column (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Steering coupling (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Universal joint (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Flexible coupling
      • 0.14% fail on Steering wheel (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Steering shaft (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Steering lock (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Steering operation (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Power steering (72% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.057% fail on Electronic power steering (22 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.057% fail on Locking devices
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (61% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust system (29% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Emissions (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Fuel system (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Cap
      • 0.23% fail on Pipe
      • 0.057% fail on Tank
      • 0.057% fail on Hose
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested (91% worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 3.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (32% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts (54% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (51% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Requirements
      • 0.028% fail on Installation check
        • 0.028% fail on Anchorage's
    • 1.7% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.028% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
  • 3.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (60% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Body condition (75% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.62% fail on Spare wheel (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Doors (56% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers (65% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Passengers front (68% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Vehicle structure (81% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Chassis (81% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.25% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Drivers
      • 0.057% fail on Passengers
    • 0.085% fail on Body security
    • 0.085% fail on Load security
      • 0.085% fail on Loading door
    • 0.028% fail on Speedometer
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.028% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.54% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment
    • 0.23% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 0.31% fail on Towbars
    • 0.28% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.028% fail on Towbar