Vauxhall Combo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
42.9% pass rate
from 9,767 tests in 2017
(14% worse than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Combo is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Suspension (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 17% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 17% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Location
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (97% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 10% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (21% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Condition
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms (22% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (22% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
      • 0.041% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Drive shafts (21% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Front drive shafts (21% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (21% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.051% fail on Couplings
      • 0.082% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.072% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.010% fail on Universal joint
    • 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers (53% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Condition (53% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints (22% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Component mounting (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Subframe mounting (65% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Spring mounting (99% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Wheel bearings (58% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Front (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Rear
    • 0.45% fail on Tie bars/rods (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Attachment
    • 0.26% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.051% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.051% fail on Condition
    • 0.041% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.020% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.020% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.010% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.010% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.010% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.010% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.010% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.010% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.5% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (20% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.7% fail on Front lamps (11% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps (49% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.010% fail on Switch
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp (21% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Direction indicators (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Flashing type (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Individual lamps (63% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.58% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.041% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.041% fail on Switch
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp (40% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Switch
      • 0.010% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.010% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.010% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.010% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.0% fail on Battery (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Fog lamp (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Tell tale (85% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Switch
    • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Hazard warning (63% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Lamp
      • 0.031% fail on Switch (92% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.082% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.051% fail on Trailer electrical socket (77% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 21% fail on Brakes (11% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (10% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Parking brake performance (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.0% fail on Rear wheels (41% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Front wheels (29% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake imbalance (39% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.031% fail on Brake operation
    • 9.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (24% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.0% fail on Components (28% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 8.3% fail on Pipes (54% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Hoses
        • 0.092% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.061% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.020% fail on Valves (98% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.010% fail on Servos
      • 0.37% fail on Leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Operation
    • 3.8% fail on Hub components (19% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Brake pads (24% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs (38% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.041% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.2% fail on ABS
    • 0.93% fail on Parking brake (24% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Condition (24% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake control components (38% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Pedal (38% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Anti-slip (44% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.27% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.23% fail on Cable
      • 0.031% fail on Lever
      • 0.020% fail on Linkage
  • 15% fail on Driver's view of the road (31% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Wipers (26% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Washers (48% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Windscreen (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.010% fail on Bonnet
  • 15% fail on Tyres (79% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.3% fail on Tread depth (69% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Condition (96% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Size/type (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 10.0% fail on Steering (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.1% fail on Steering system (66% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Track rod end (63% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Free play (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint (48% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Steering arm (200% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Drag link end (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
        • 0.13% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.65% fail on Steering control (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Steering coupling (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.33% fail on Universal joint (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.010% fail on Flexible coupling
      • 0.20% fail on Steering column (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.031% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.020% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.22% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.10% fail on Power steering (87% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Operation (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.041% fail on Electronic power steering (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Rams
    • 0.061% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.051% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust system (51% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system (69% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Cap
      • 0.24% fail on Pipe
      • 0.072% fail on Tank (68% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Hose
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions
    • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (54% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Doors (35% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers other (47% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers
    • 0.52% fail on Body condition (81% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Spare wheel (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Drivers
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers
    • 0.25% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.24% fail on Vehicle structure (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Chassis (81% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.041% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.031% fail on Body security (74% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Load security
      • 0.020% fail on Loading door
  • 2.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (51% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (25% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (24% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.010% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
      • 0.010% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Condition (32% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Prescribed areas (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
      • 0.031% fail on Requirements
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.50% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 0.23% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.051% fail on Towbars (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.051% fail on Vehicle structure