MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Vauxhall » Combo » 2010
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Vauxhall Combo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.8% pass rate
from 8,166 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Combo is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (19% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim (58% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (33% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Front lamps (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Rear lamps (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on All position lamps (83% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp (24% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.012% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.012% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (45% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps (39% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.012% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.012% fail on Switch
    • 0.66% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Horn
    • 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Fog lamp (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.098% fail on Hazard warning (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Lamp
      • 0.024% fail on Switch (89% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.037% fail on Rear reflectors (88% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.012% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 18% fail on Suspension (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 11% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 11% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Location
    • 8.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (89% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.037% fail on Attachment (78% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.98% fail on Suspension arms (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (54% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Wheel bearings (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Front (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Rear
    • 0.43% fail on Front suspension joints (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Drive shafts (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Front drive shafts (91% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Constant velocity joints (91% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Tie bars/rods (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment
      • 0.012% fail on Condition
    • 0.098% fail on Macpherson strut (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.073% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.037% fail on Condition
      • 0.024% fail on Attachment
      • 0.012% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.049% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.049% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.024% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.012% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.012% fail on Condition
    • 0.012% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.012% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 9.7% fail on Tyres (57% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Condition (96% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth (27% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Size/type (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (15% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Washers (76% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.87% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.36% fail on Mirrors (54% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.037% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.2% fail on Brakes (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (31% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.45% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.024% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.3% fail on Hub components (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (48% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Brake discs (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.037% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.66% fail on Hydraulic systems (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Components (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Pipes (83% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Hoses
        • 0.012% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.13% fail on Leaks
      • 0.024% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Operation
    • 0.61% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.61% fail on Pedal
        • 0.60% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.012% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on ABS (77% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.11% fail on Cable
    • 0.061% fail on Restricted movement
  • 4.0% fail on Steering
    • 3.5% fail on Steering system
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end (25% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Free play (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.50% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Steering rack (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Steering arm (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Drag link end (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Other components
        • 0.061% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.44% fail on Steering control (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering column (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Steering coupling (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Universal joint (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.012% fail on Flexible coupling
      • 0.037% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.037% fail on Steering shaft (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.086% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.024% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.012% fail on Power steering
      • 0.012% fail on Operation
  • 2.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (42% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Fuel system (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on System
      • 0.061% fail on Pipe
      • 0.049% fail on Cap (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Tank
      • 0.012% fail on Hose
    • 0.098% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.012% fail on Emissions
  • 1.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.28% fail on Body condition (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Spare wheel (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
      • 0.037% fail on Passengers
    • 0.15% fail on Doors (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.049% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.037% fail on Drivers
    • 0.098% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.024% fail on Body security
    • 0.024% fail on Load security
      • 0.012% fail on Access panel
      • 0.012% fail on Loading door
    • 0.012% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.77% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.012% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.53% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (59% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (50% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner (19 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.024% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.086% fail on Attachment