MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Vauxhall » Corsavan » 2002
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Vauxhall Corsavan MOT Results

Registered in 2002
44.3% pass rate
from 350 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Corsavan is unusually good or bad.

  • 37% fail on Suspension (46% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 15% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 15% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 15% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 12% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 12% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 9.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage condition
    • 6.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.0% fail on Rear (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Front
    • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Component mounting (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.57% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 33% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (63% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.29% fail on Switch
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.1% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.1% fail on Battery
    • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.3% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Horn
    • 0.86% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 27% fail on Brakes
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (46% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 15% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 11% fail on Components
        • 9.1% fail on Pipes
        • 2.3% fail on Valves
        • 1.4% fail on Hoses
        • 0.29% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.1% fail on Leaks
    • 2.9% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.1% fail on Pedal
        • 0.86% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.86% fail on Cable
      • 0.29% fail on Pivot
    • 0.57% fail on Air and vacuum systems (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Operation
      • 0.29% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.29% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.29% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 16% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 10% fail on Wipers
    • 6.0% fail on Washers
    • 2.3% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
  • 13% fail on Tyres (57% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 6.3% fail on Condition (88% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.9% fail on Emissions (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.0% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Cap
  • 9.1% fail on Steering
    • 8.0% fail on Steering system
      • 5.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.86% fail on Free play
        • 0.86% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.86% fail on Steering arm (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Steering control (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Steering column (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.57% fail on Steering operation
  • 3.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (58% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Engine mountings (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Doors
      • 0.57% fail on Drivers
    • 0.57% fail on Seats
      • 0.57% fail on Drivers
    • 0.29% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.29% fail on Chassis
    • 0.29% fail on Body condition
    • 0.29% fail on Load security
      • 0.29% fail on Bootlid
  • 1.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (73% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Seat belts (79% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Prescribed areas (82% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 0.57% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.29% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.29% fail on Drivers airbag