MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Vauxhall » Corsavan » 2002
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Vauxhall Corsavan MOT Results

Registered in 2002
47.9% pass rate
from 238 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Corsavan is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.8% fail on Headlamps (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.8% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.1% fail on Horn
      • 0.84% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.84% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 8.4% fail on Springs (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.4% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.4% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.84% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.7% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.7% fail on Sub-frame (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (77% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (96% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.42% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.84% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.7% fail on Cable
      • 0.42% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.42% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.1% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.84% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.42% fail on Pedal
    • 0.84% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.42% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.42% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.42% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.42% fail on Lever
    • 0.42% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.42% fail on Valves
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.8% fail on Transmission (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.8% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.8% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on System (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Pipe
    • 1.3% fail on Seats
      • 1.3% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.42% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.42% fail on Undertray
  • 14% fail on Steering (99% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 6.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Steering play (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Steering rack (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.5% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.42% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.42% fail on Steering column
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 8.0% fail on Washers
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.84% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.42% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.42% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Tyres (92% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Size/type (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (82% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (94% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.0% fail on Compression ignition (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.42% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.84% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.42% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.42% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.84% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plates