Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Vauxhall Corsavan MOT Results

Registered in 2003
45.0% pass rate
from 604 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Corsavan is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 14% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 14% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Location
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Couplings
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.6% fail on Rear (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Front
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.50% fail on Prescribed areas (93% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Component mounting (88% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.17% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 27% fail on Brakes (23% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (54% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 16% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.66% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance (77% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.9% fail on Components
        • 8.3% fail on Pipes
        • 1.3% fail on Hoses
        • 0.99% fail on Valves (65% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.50% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.33% fail on Cylinders (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
    • 3.6% fail on Parking brake (180% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.17% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.66% fail on ABS
    • 0.50% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.50% fail on Cable
    • 0.50% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal
        • 0.17% fail on Condition
        • 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.33% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.17% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.17% fail on Components
        • 0.17% fail on Pump/compressors
  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (32% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.50% fail on Rear lamps (83% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.50% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 3.0% fail on Battery
    • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.8% fail on Fog lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (62% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Horn
    • 0.83% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.33% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.33% fail on Lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.1% fail on Washers
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.99% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.50% fail on Mirrors
  • 13% fail on Tyres (45% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 6.1% fail on Condition (73% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (66% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.3% fail on Emissions (88% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Fuel system (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Cap
      • 0.33% fail on Tank
      • 0.17% fail on Pipe
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 10% fail on Steering (39% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Steering system (53% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.7% fail on Free play (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.2% fail on Steering arm (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
        • 0.17% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.50% fail on Steering control
      • 0.33% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.33% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.17% fail on Steering column
    • 0.33% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (49% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (62% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Prescribed areas (71% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (83% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Doors
      • 0.33% fail on Drivers
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.33% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.33% fail on Load security
      • 0.33% fail on Bootlid (45 times worse than other 2003 vans)