Vauxhall Corsavan MOT Results
Registered in 200346.8% pass rate
from 218 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Corsavan is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(95% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (180% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint
- 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes
-
8.3% fail on
Springs
(120% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
8.3% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 8.3% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
8.3% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
7.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.5% fail on Ball joint
- 3.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (80% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.92% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.92% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.92% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.46% fail on Ball joint
- 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(95% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(74% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.46% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.46% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.92% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
- 0.46% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
11% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(74% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
-
0.92% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.92% fail on Brake discs
-
0.92% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.92% fail on Cable
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.8% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.4% fail on Pedal
- 0.46% fail on Hand lever
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.8% fail on Lever
-
1.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Valves (11 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.92% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(14 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Servos
- 0.46% fail on Valves
- 0.46% fail on Load sensing valves
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
18% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
12% fail on
Transmission
(150% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
12% fail on
Drive shafts
(200% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 12% fail on Joints (200% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
12% fail on
Drive shafts
(200% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.92% fail on
Doors
-
0.92% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.92% fail on Door condition
-
0.92% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.46% fail on Bumpers
-
0.46% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.46% fail on Boot lid condition
-
12% fail on
Transmission
(150% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.46% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.4% fail on Horn
- 0.46% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.46% fail on Battery(ies)
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.46% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.46% fail on Position lamp
- 0.46% fail on Rear reflectors
-
5.5% fail on
Headlamps
-
9.6% fail on
Steering
-
7.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 6.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.46% fail on Ball joint
-
2.3% fail on
Steering gear
- 2.3% fail on Steering rack
- 0.46% fail on Prescribed areas
-
7.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
8.3% fail on
Visibility
- 5.0% fail on Washers
- 3.2% fail on Wipers
-
0.46% fail on
View to rear
- 0.46% fail on Mirrors
-
8.3% fail on
Tyres
- 6.0% fail on Tread depth
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 0.46% fail on Size/type
-
5.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.7% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.92% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.46% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.46% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.46% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.46% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
3.7% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.4% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
4.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.8% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.8% fail on Registration plates
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(73% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.92% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.46% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.46% fail on Condition
-
0.92% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.46% fail on Condition
- 0.46% fail on Attachment