MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Vauxhall » Corsavan » 2005
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Vauxhall Corsavan MOT Results

Registered in 2005
42.4% pass rate
from 706 tests in 2017
(15% worse than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Corsavan is unusually good or bad.

  • 36% fail on Suspension (55% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 16% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 15% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Location
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (95% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage condition
    • 12% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 12% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 12% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.1% fail on Rear
      • 0.57% fail on Front (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.85% fail on Tie bars/rods (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.57% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Radius arms (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Axles
      • 0.14% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.14% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.8% fail on Headlamp aim (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamps (54% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp (58% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.5% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.71% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 4.5% fail on Fog lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Battery (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Horn
    • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Lamp
  • 28% fail on Brakes (47% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 9.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.6% fail on Components
        • 8.1% fail on Pipes (50% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Hoses
        • 0.14% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.85% fail on Leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 3.1% fail on Parking brake (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.71% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.28% fail on Wheel cylinder
      • 0.14% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical components (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on ABS
    • 0.42% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.42% fail on Pedal
        • 0.28% fail on Condition
        • 0.14% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.42% fail on Restricted movement
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.4% fail on Washers (52% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.99% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.2% fail on Condition (55% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Valve stem (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Size/type
  • 10% fail on Steering (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.8% fail on Steering system (78% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Track rod end (61% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Free play (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.71% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.57% fail on Steering arm (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
        • 0.14% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.42% fail on Steering control
      • 0.28% fail on Steering column (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Steering wheel
  • 6.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on System (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Pipe
    • 0.71% fail on Emissions
  • 2.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (44% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.85% fail on Seat belts (73% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Prescribed areas (74% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
  • 2.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.57% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (89% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Body condition (90% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Condition