Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Vauxhall Corsavan MOT Results

Registered in 2009
58.8% pass rate
from 955 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Corsavan is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp (32% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.10% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.94% fail on Direction indicators (63% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Flashing type (63% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.84% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.52% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.31% fail on Horn
    • 0.31% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (85% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp (85% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp (85% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Springs (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 10% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 10% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.94% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Sub-frame (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.94% fail on Suspension arms (81% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes (77% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint (91% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.73% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.73% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Wheel bearings (77% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Size/type
  • 7.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers (46% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on View to rear
      • 0.63% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.42% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.42% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.8% fail on Brakes (53% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.10% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.10% fail on Lever
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (71% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 0.94% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.63% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (88% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt (89% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.94% fail on Pedal
    • 0.52% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake fluid (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.21% fail on Lever
    • 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 4.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (49% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.73% fail on Doors
      • 0.52% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.52% fail on Door condition
      • 0.10% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
      • 0.10% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
    • 0.52% fail on Transmission (86% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Drive shafts (87% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on Joints (87% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Belts
    • 0.42% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.21% fail on Pipe
      • 0.21% fail on System
    • 0.31% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.21% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.21% fail on Sub-frame (21 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Sub-frame condition (26 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Chassis
      • 0.21% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.21% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.10% fail on Bracket
    • 0.21% fail on Body
      • 0.10% fail on Panel
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component
    • 0.10% fail on Towbar
      • 0.10% fail on Towbar condition
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (53% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (58% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition (54% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.21% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (92% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.10% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.42% fail on Spark ignition (69% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (74% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.52% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.42% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (60% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components (64% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end (64% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.31% fail on Steering play
      • 0.31% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.10% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.10% fail on Steering column
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.63% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (72% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Seat belts (77% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Attachment