Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Vauxhall Corsavan MOT Results

Registered in 2009
61.0% pass rate
from 875 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Corsavan is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (15% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Headlamp aim (69% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (37% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps (75% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp (73% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp (34% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps (46% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Front lamps (57% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (53% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (53% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.57% fail on Horn
    • 0.23% fail on Battery
    • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 19% fail on Suspension (26% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 9.7% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (40% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (73% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage condition
    • 4.8% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms (62% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (61% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Front drive shafts (75% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Constant velocity joints (75% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.34% fail on Rear
      • 0.11% fail on Front
    • 0.34% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Component mounting
  • 8.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.1% fail on Washers (57% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.57% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Brakes (71% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance (77% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.23% fail on Rear wheels (92% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance (95% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake operation (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.1% fail on Hub components (72% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake pads (72% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.57% fail on ABS
    • 0.34% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.34% fail on Pedal
        • 0.34% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic systems (93% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Components (93% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Hoses
        • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.11% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 1.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on System
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
    • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.46% fail on Body condition
    • 0.34% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Drivers
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.11% fail on Body security
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers
  • 0.91% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.69% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.69% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.23% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.69% fail on Steering (82% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Steering system (82% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.11% fail on Steering control
      • 0.11% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.11% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.57% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment