Vauxhall Movano MOT Results
Registered in 200247.8% pass rate
from 749 tests in 2021
(11% worse than other 2002 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Movano is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Brakes
(64% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
25% fail on
Brake performance
(100% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
18% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 18% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
12% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(130% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
12% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(130% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 11% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
12% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(130% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
7.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
7.1% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.1% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.27% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
7.1% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
- 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.27% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
- 0.53% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
18% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 4.5% fail on Load sensing valves (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs
-
0.93% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.67% fail on Cable
- 0.27% fail on Lever
- 0.13% fail on Rod
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.1% fail on Lever
-
0.93% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.93% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.67% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.53% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.27% fail on Pedal
- 0.27% fail on Hand lever
-
0.40% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.13% fail on Servos
- 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.13% fail on Valves
-
0.27% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.27% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.27% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.27% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.13% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.27% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
25% fail on
Brake performance
(100% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
4.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
4.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
3.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.8% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.5% fail on Battery(ies) (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Horn
- 0.27% fail on Electrical wiring
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamps
(50% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp (52% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.80% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.80% fail on Position lamp
- 0.80% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.13% fail on
Outline marker lamps
- 0.13% fail on Outline marker lamp
-
0.13% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.13% fail on Switch
-
19% fail on
Suspension
- 9.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.0% fail on Ball joint
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.40% fail on Linkage
- 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.7% fail on
Springs
(50% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.67% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.53% fail on Shackle bracket (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Anchor bracket
-
1.2% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.53% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (14 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
-
0.80% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.80% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.67% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.13% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.13% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.13% fail on Suspension rod
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
3.6% fail on
Transmission
-
3.6% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.5% fail on Joints
- 0.13% fail on Drive shaft
-
3.6% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.7% fail on
Chassis
- 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.67% fail on Tank
- 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.13% fail on Pipe
-
0.80% fail on
Body
- 0.53% fail on Panel
- 0.27% fail on Other body component
-
0.67% fail on
Doors
-
0.27% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.27% fail on Hinge (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.27% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.27% fail on Door condition
-
0.13% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.13% fail on Door condition
-
0.27% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.40% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.40% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.13% fail on Bumpers
-
0.13% fail on
Load security
-
0.13% fail on
Dropside
- 0.13% fail on Dropside condition
-
0.13% fail on
Dropside
-
0.13% fail on
Seats
- 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.13% fail on
Cabs
- 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Undertray
-
3.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 5.7% fail on Washers
- 5.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.53% fail on Bonnet
-
0.27% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.27% fail on Windscreen
-
0.27% fail on
View to rear
- 0.27% fail on Mirrors
-
9.5% fail on
Steering
(43% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
7.6% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.6% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(69% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Drag link end
-
0.80% fail on
Power steering
- 0.67% fail on Operation
- 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.13% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.13% fail on
Steering play
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
-
7.6% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
4.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.53% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.53% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.1% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.93% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.93% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Requirements
- 0.53% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.8% fail on
Tyres
(47% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth (56% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Size/type
-
0.67% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.67% fail on Registration plates