Vauxhall Movano MOT Results

Registered in 2016
67.0% pass rate
from 6,142 tests in 2021
(22% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Movano is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps (94% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (45% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (38% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (64% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators (96% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type (96% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.049% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Switch
    • 0.41% fail on Position lamps (77% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Position lamp (80% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.20% fail on Horn
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.081% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.20% fail on Outline marker lamps (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Outline marker lamp (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.13% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.033% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.033% fail on Main beam tell-tale (13 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Brakes (79% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.065% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.065% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.94% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.049% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.033% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.033% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.016% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.70% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (47% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (44% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (44% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.033% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (83% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (84% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.098% fail on Lever
    • 0.62% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (84% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Pedal (98% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.47% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.36% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.24% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.44% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.18% fail on Lever
    • 0.13% fail on Air and vacuum systems (17 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Servos (20 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Leaks (55 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.065% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.033% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.033% fail on Valves (21 times worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility (31% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Washers (36% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.68% fail on View to rear (76% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Mirrors (80% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.57% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.57% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.33% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (83% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission (69% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts (60% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Joints (60% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.033% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.20% fail on Prop shafts (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
        • 0.081% fail on Flexible couplings (20 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Panel (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Body condition
    • 0.34% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Doors (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.081% fail on Door condition
        • 0.016% fail on Hinge
      • 0.033% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.033% fail on Door condition
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.065% fail on Tank
      • 0.016% fail on System
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.065% fail on Load security
      • 0.049% fail on Loading door
      • 0.016% fail on Dropside
        • 0.016% fail on Dropside condition
    • 0.065% fail on Undertray
    • 0.049% fail on Towbar
      • 0.033% fail on Safety device (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.033% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.033% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.016% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.016% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.016% fail on Chassis
      • 0.016% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.016% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.016% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 3.0% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.081% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Anti-roll bars (41% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage ball joints (61% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Linkage
      • 0.081% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.065% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.049% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.36% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.34% fail on Other suspension component (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.016% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers (52% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.081% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.033% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.033% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.016% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.065% fail on Springs (96% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Leaf springs (82% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.016% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.033% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.016% fail on Mounting
    • 0.049% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.016% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (25% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (26% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition (27% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.098% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.049% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (84% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.57% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.016% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.049% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.033% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.033% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.065% fail on Noise suppression (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Undertray
      • 0.016% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 0.94% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.47% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
      • 0.065% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Requirements
      • 0.016% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.033% fail on Airbags
      • 0.033% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.78% fail on Steering
    • 0.34% fail on Power steering (97% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.081% fail on Other components
    • 0.24% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Operation
      • 0.016% fail on Steering box
    • 0.20% fail on Steering linkage components (74% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Track rod end (79% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Other components
        • 0.016% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.016% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.016% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.016% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.016% fail on Steering play
      • 0.016% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.016% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.41% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.049% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.033% fail on Attachment
    • 0.016% fail on Condition