Vauxhall Movano MOT Results

Registered in 2016
70.1% pass rate
from 6,251 tests in 2020
(35% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Movano is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (75% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim (52% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim (44% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.016% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Individual direction indicators (76% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Switch
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Outline marker lamps (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Outline marker lamp (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on All outline marker lamps (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Electrical equipment (68% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Horn
      • 0.080% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.24% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.032% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.032% fail on Switch
    • 0.016% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.016% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 7.8% fail on Brakes (55% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (51% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (50% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (49% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.064% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (97% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs (98% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.14% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Linkage
    • 3.2% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.27% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.016% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt
          • 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.064% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.032% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.58% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.56% fail on Pedal (65% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.29% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.21% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.18% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.080% fail on Parking brake control (78% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Lever (78% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.080% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.064% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.016% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.032% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.032% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.016% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.016% fail on Leaks
    • 0.016% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility (58% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers (69% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Washers (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Condition of glass (94% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Windscreen (95% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on View to rear (79% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Mirrors (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.096% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.080% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Body (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Other body component (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Panel (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Body condition
    • 0.80% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Joints (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.016% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.096% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.064% fail on Flexible couplings (27 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Joints
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.064% fail on Tank
      • 0.064% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Hose
      • 0.016% fail on Pipe
    • 0.21% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.18% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.032% fail on Door condition
      • 0.016% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Undertray (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Spare wheel condition (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Carrier
    • 0.048% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.016% fail on Chassis
      • 0.016% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.016% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.016% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.016% fail on Load security
      • 0.016% fail on Dropside
        • 0.016% fail on Other dropside component
  • 1.4% fail on Suspension (35% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint (85% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.38% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.064% fail on Linkage
      • 0.064% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.048% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.032% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.032% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.016% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers (59% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.080% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.032% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.016% fail on Axles
      • 0.016% fail on Axle
    • 0.016% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.016% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.82% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.080% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.016% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.016% fail on Oxygen sensor
      • 0.35% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.016% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.096% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.064% fail on Other leaks (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.032% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.032% fail on Undertray
  • 0.48% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.30% fail on Seat belts (45% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition (50% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Requirements
      • 0.016% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.22% fail on Steering
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering
      • 0.096% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.016% fail on Other components
    • 0.064% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.064% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.032% fail on Steering linkage components (84% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.016% fail on Steering arm
  • 0.16% fail on Identification of the vehicle (54% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plates (54% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.032% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.032% fail on Condition