Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Vauxhall Vivaro MOT Results

Registered in 2005
45.9% pass rate
from 10,697 tests in 2017
(8.5% worse than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Vivaro is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (8.8% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 12% fail on Position lamps (43% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Front lamps (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Rear lamps (19% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.019% fail on Switch
    • 9.0% fail on Stop lamp (27% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Headlamp aim (24% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (29% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.12% fail on Switch (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.037% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.028% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
        • 0.0093% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.037% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.028% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.019% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
        • 0.0093% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0093% fail on Matched pair
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators (23% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type (22% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.25% fail on All direction indicators (49% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (82% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.065% fail on Switch
    • 2.9% fail on Hazard warning (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Tell tale (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Horn (30% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (30% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Fog lamp (30% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.028% fail on Switch
    • 0.42% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.019% fail on Battery (98% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 28% fail on Suspension (20% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 10% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.075% fail on Attachment
    • 8.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (37% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (58% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage condition (47% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0093% fail on Condition
      • 0.0093% fail on Presence
    • 5.8% fail on Front suspension joints (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Coil springs (20% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Condition (20% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.084% fail on Location
    • 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers (75% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Condition (75% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.6% fail on Front
      • 0.82% fail on Rear (75% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (57% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Front drive shafts (57% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (57% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.0093% fail on Couplings
      • 0.047% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.047% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.68% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas (93% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Component mounting (94% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Subframe mounting (71% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.0093% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.20% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.15% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0093% fail on Condition
    • 0.065% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.056% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.0093% fail on Attachment
    • 0.056% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.047% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.0093% fail on Attachment
    • 0.028% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.028% fail on Suspension unit
  • 20% fail on Brakes (6.7% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (16% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Parking brake performance (63% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Rear wheels (35% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Front wheels (44% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Brake imbalance (46% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.019% fail on Brake operation
    • 6.1% fail on Hub components (91% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (88% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Brake calipers (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.028% fail on Brake linings
    • 3.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (51% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Components (49% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes (56% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Hoses (46% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.075% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.0093% fail on Valves
      • 0.15% fail on Leaks (60% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (70% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Operation
    • 2.6% fail on ABS (72% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.019% fail on Fitment
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Lever (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.0093% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake control components (58% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal (58% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Anti-slip (52% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.019% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.0093% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.0093% fail on Locking devices
  • 15% fail on Driver's view of the road (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Wipers (20% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Washers (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Mirrors (36% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.0093% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 11% fail on Steering (73% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 10% fail on Steering system (85% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.32% fail on Steering arm (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Free play
        • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.065% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.037% fail on Other components
        • 0.028% fail on Steering pivot point
        • 0.0093% fail on Steering component
    • 0.94% fail on Power steering
      • 0.55% fail on Operation (51% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Pump (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
      • 0.093% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.047% fail on Rams
      • 0.037% fail on Drive system
    • 0.093% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.084% fail on Steering control
      • 0.037% fail on Steering column
      • 0.028% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.019% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.019% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.019% fail on Locking devices
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.43% fail on Size/type
    • 0.19% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (12% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Drivers airbag (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.019% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts (60% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (30% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
      • 0.056% fail on Requirements
      • 0.037% fail on Prescribed areas (98% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.0093% fail on Installation check
        • 0.0093% fail on Anchorage's
  • 2.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (58% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Body condition (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Doors
      • 0.26% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.24% fail on Drivers
      • 0.14% fail on Passengers other (57% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Seats
      • 0.25% fail on Drivers
      • 0.047% fail on Passengers (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure (90% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Chassis (90% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.093% fail on Body security
    • 0.047% fail on Load security
      • 0.028% fail on Loading door
      • 0.019% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.028% fail on Spare wheel (76% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 2.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Exhaust system (75% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Fuel system (42% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Tank
      • 0.22% fail on System (48% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Cap (59% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Pipe (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.0093% fail on Hose
    • 0.44% fail on Emissions (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested (56% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN (38% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels (40% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment (52% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.093% fail on Condition
  • 0.037% fail on Towbars (77% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.037% fail on Towbar