Vauxhall Vivaro MOT Results

Registered in 2010
51.8% pass rate
from 7,348 tests in 2017
(23% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Vivaro is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.4% fail on Position lamps (33% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.8% fail on Front lamps (57% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Rear lamps (48% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (37% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp (29% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (16% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.027% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.014% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.014% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.014% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.014% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.2% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Lamp (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Tell tale (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.1% fail on Horn (66% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.98% fail on Direction indicators (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Flashing type (64% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Individual lamps (60% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.095% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.095% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.068% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.041% fail on Battery (77% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 23% fail on Suspension (68% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 9.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.027% fail on Couplings
        • 0.014% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.11% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (33% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (41% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage condition (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Macpherson strut (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Front (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Rear (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Coil springs (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Location (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Trailing arms (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.041% fail on Attachment (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.027% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.027% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.014% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.014% fail on Condition
    • 0.014% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment
    • 0.014% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.014% fail on Component mounting
  • 17% fail on Brakes (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Brake performance (61% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Parking brake performance (79% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Rear wheels (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.42% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.0% fail on Hub components (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Brake pads (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.33% fail on Brake calipers (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.027% fail on Brake back plates
    • 5.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (90% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Components (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Pipes (95% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.90% fail on Hoses (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.041% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.041% fail on Servos (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Leaks
      • 0.068% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical components (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Cable (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Lever
      • 0.014% fail on Pivot
    • 0.69% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.69% fail on Condition
    • 0.54% fail on ABS
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake control components (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Pedal (47% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Anti-slip (55% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.082% fail on Condition
      • 0.014% fail on Pedal linkage
        • 0.014% fail on Cable
    • 0.19% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.014% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.014% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment
    • 0.014% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
      • 0.014% fail on Warning
    • 0.014% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.014% fail on Components
        • 0.014% fail on Servos
  • 12% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 12% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 12% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Free play
        • 0.095% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.082% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.041% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.027% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
        • 0.014% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
      • 0.041% fail on Pipes and hoses (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
    • 0.11% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.068% fail on Steering control
      • 0.041% fail on Steering column
      • 0.014% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.014% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.027% fail on Locking devices
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers (43% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.94% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.73% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
    • 0.16% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (86% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (85% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.014% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 0.76% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
      • 0.095% fail on Attachment
      • 0.014% fail on Requirements
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.37% fail on Body condition
    • 0.23% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.027% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.16% fail on Engine mountings (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.095% fail on Drivers
      • 0.068% fail on Passengers
    • 0.041% fail on Load security
      • 0.041% fail on Loading door
    • 0.027% fail on Body security
    • 0.027% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.41% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on System
      • 0.068% fail on Cap
      • 0.041% fail on Tank
    • 0.12% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.082% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.027% fail on Emissions
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.068% fail on Attachment
  • 0.027% fail on Towbars
    • 0.027% fail on Towbar