Volkswagen Amarok MOT Results

Registered in 2015
84.6% pass rate
from 3,533 tests in 2020
(36% better than other 2015 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Amarok is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (45% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.085% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Stop lamp (50% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Headlamp (56% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.71% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.54% fail on Position lamps (61% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Position lamp (59% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (75% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.20% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.085% fail on Direction indicators (93% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Flashing type (93% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.028% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 4.1% fail on Brakes (31% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.028% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.54% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.057% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.028% fail on Cable
        • 0.028% fail on Lever
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.82% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp) (56% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (16 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.45% fail on Rbt
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.057% fail on Decelerometer (18 times worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 0.057% fail on Service brake performance (23 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.17% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.057% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.057% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (15 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt
          • 0.17% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.17% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (15 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.11% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.11% fail on Lever
    • 0.11% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (71% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.028% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.085% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (80% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.057% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.028% fail on Valves
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres (39% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (30% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Size/type
  • 2.5% fail on Visibility (53% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.57% fail on Wipers (77% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.28% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.057% fail on View to rear (87% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Mirrors (87% better than other 2015 vans)
  • 1.5% fail on Suspension (59% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.31% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.20% fail on Anti-roll bars (83% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.028% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.14% fail on Springs (84% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Coil spring (89% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.057% fail on Leaf spring
    • 0.028% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.028% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 0.54% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (64% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Exhaust emissions (70% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Compression ignition (64% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (57% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.028% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.028% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.085% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.42% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (51% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.37% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.37% fail on Steering
    • 0.31% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.028% fail on Power steering
      • 0.028% fail on Pump
  • 0.37% fail on Body, chassis, structure (78% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Transmission (82% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts (80% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.085% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.085% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.085% fail on Doors
      • 0.057% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.057% fail on Door condition
      • 0.028% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.028% fail on Door condition
    • 0.057% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.028% fail on Tank
      • 0.028% fail on Pipe
    • 0.028% fail on Exhaust system
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels (170% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Condition