Volkswagen Amarok MOT Results

Registered in 2016
85.9% pass rate
from 3,184 tests in 2020
(32% better than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Amarok is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (46% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.66% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.41% fail on Headlamps (74% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.22% fail on Position lamps (80% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Position lamp (80% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.031% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.094% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.031% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.063% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.063% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 4.2% fail on Brakes
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.031% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.35% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.88% fail on Brake performance (38% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (sp) (58% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (18 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt
          • 0.094% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.031% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.094% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.063% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (16 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.063% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Pedal (81% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.16% fail on Lever
    • 0.063% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.063% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.063% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.031% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.031% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.031% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.031% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 2.4% fail on Visibility (43% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.60% fail on Wipers (66% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.28% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.063% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.3% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.75% fail on Tread depth (60% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.94% fail on Suspension (56% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.35% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Linkage
      • 0.031% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  • 0.69% fail on Identification of the vehicle (97% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Registration plates (98% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.47% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.41% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
      • 0.031% fail on Requirements
    • 0.063% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.19% fail on Steering
    • 0.094% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.094% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Steering play (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.031% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (86% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.031% fail on Tank
      • 0.031% fail on Pipe
    • 0.063% fail on Doors
      • 0.063% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.063% fail on Door condition
    • 0.031% fail on Transmission
      • 0.031% fail on Belts
    • 0.031% fail on Body
      • 0.031% fail on Other body component
  • 0.19% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (83% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.094% fail on Exhaust emissions (91% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Compression ignition (92% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (89% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.031% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.094% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.063% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.031% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.094% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.094% fail on Attachment