Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Volkswagen Caddy MOT Results

Registered in 1992
58.2% pass rate
from 79 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caddy is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 14% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 14% fail on Fog lamp
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 3.8% fail on Side repeaters
    • 6.3% fail on Horn
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.3% fail on Switch
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.3% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.3% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 1.3% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.3% fail on Lamp
      • 1.3% fail on Tell tale
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 13% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.5% fail on Spring mounting
    • 3.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Front
      • 1.3% fail on Rear
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 10% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.5% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
    • 8.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.3% fail on Components
        • 3.8% fail on Valves
        • 1.3% fail on Pipes
        • 1.3% fail on Hoses
        • 1.3% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.3% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 1.3% fail on Leaks
    • 1.3% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 16% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.6% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on System
      • 1.3% fail on Tank
      • 1.3% fail on Pipe
      • 1.3% fail on Cap
    • 5.1% fail on Emissions
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.3% fail on Washers
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.9% fail on Steering
    • 8.9% fail on Steering system
      • 7.6% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.3% fail on Steering control
      • 1.3% fail on Steering coupling
        • 1.3% fail on Universal joint
  • 6.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 5.1% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Engine mountings
    • 1.3% fail on Seats
      • 1.3% fail on Drivers
  • 3.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment