Volkswagen Caddy MOT Results

Registered in 1992
63.8% pass rate
from 58 tests in 2020
(19% better than other 1992 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caddy is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (16% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Stop lamp (140% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Direction indicators (36% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Flashing type (36% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 5.2% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 6.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (6.9% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (6.9% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 6.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (0.74% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (190% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Electrical equipment (23% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Horn (31% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.7% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.7% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Suspension (2.1% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (8.5% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms (25% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.7% fail on Springs
      • 1.7% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.7% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 10% fail on Brakes (36% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (50% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance (71% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 1.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.7% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 10% fail on Steering (88% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Steering gear (140% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Steering rack (150% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Operation
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components (27% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end (62% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Operation
      • 1.7% fail on Other components
    • 1.7% fail on Steering wheel
  • 10% fail on Visibility (3.9% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers (8.6% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Washers (26% better than other 1992 vans)
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (33% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Transmission (6.6% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts (14% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 5.2% fail on Joints (14% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system (31% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Tank
      • 1.7% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 3.4% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Driver's door (33 times worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Door condition (33 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Front passenger's door (7 times worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Load security
      • 1.7% fail on Tailgate
    • 1.7% fail on Seats
      • 1.7% fail on Driver's seat
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (17% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (3.9% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Spark ignition (34% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 1992 vans)
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (8.2% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts (8.2% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas (27% worse than other 1992 vans)
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Condition