Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Volkswagen Caddy MOT Results

Registered in 2002
49.6% pass rate
from 963 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caddy is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (13% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear lamps (47% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (35% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.31% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators (40% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type (40% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps (57% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.31% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp (72% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 0.62% fail on Horn (75% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.21% fail on Lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 25% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.7% fail on Front wheels (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Rear wheels (37% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.10% fail on Brake operation
    • 14% fail on Hydraulic systems (33% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 12% fail on Components (26% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 7.7% fail on Pipes
        • 3.7% fail on Hoses (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Valves
        • 0.21% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.10% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.10% fail on Servos
      • 1.0% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.21% fail on Brake discs (81% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.42% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.42% fail on Pedal
        • 0.42% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.21% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.21% fail on Cable
  • 20% fail on Suspension (20% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 4.9% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.10% fail on Couplings
      • 0.10% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.10% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.8% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (54% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (61% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front
      • 1.1% fail on Rear
    • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas (74% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Component mounting (85% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Subframe mounting (70% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.10% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.10% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.10% fail on Bonnet
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.0% fail on Condition (49% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Size/type
    • 0.21% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust system (53% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions
    • 0.83% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.73% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.42% fail on System
      • 0.31% fail on Tank
  • 6.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition (50% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Doors
      • 1.1% fail on Passengers front (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Drivers
    • 1.2% fail on Seats (200% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Drivers (200% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Passengers
    • 0.62% fail on Vehicle structure (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Chassis (73% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Body security
    • 0.31% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.10% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.10% fail on Load security
      • 0.10% fail on Access panel
  • 5.1% fail on Steering (33% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Steering system (31% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Steering rack (84% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end (58% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Free play
        • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
        • 0.10% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.73% fail on Steering control (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Steering column (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering
      • 0.10% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.10% fail on Rams
  • 2.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (50% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts (50% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas (50% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
      • 0.10% fail on Requirements
    • 0.62% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.62% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.42% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 0.10% fail on Towbars
    • 0.10% fail on Towbar
    • 0.10% fail on Vehicle structure