MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Volkswagen » Caddy » 2003
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Volkswagen Caddy MOT Results

Registered in 2003
47.7% pass rate
from 997 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caddy is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.20% fail on Switch
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.10% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.10% fail on Matched pair
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.70% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.40% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Fog lamp (65% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.60% fail on Switch
      • 0.40% fail on Lamp
    • 0.60% fail on Horn (73% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 24% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.7% fail on Front wheels (85% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.10% fail on Brake operation
    • 14% fail on Hydraulic systems (36% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 13% fail on Components (32% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 6.7% fail on Pipes
        • 4.0% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Valves
        • 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.80% fail on Leaks
      • 0.50% fail on Operation
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components (47% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.40% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.10% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.10% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.50% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.40% fail on Pedal
        • 0.20% fail on Condition
        • 0.20% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.40% fail on Air and vacuum systems (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up (10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Components
        • 0.10% fail on Pipes
        • 0.10% fail on Servos
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
    • 0.20% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.20% fail on Cable
  • 21% fail on Suspension (17% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 3.9% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.10% fail on Couplings
      • 0.10% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.10% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas (51% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Component mounting (65% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting (60% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Macpherson strut (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (59% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (69% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (64% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.80% fail on Front (58% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Rear
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints (56% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.10% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.10% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.80% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.30% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Size/type
  • 8.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.3% fail on Emissions
    • 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.50% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on System
      • 0.10% fail on Tank
      • 0.10% fail on Hose
      • 0.10% fail on Cap
  • 5.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.2% fail on Body condition
    • 1.2% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Passengers
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 0.50% fail on Drivers
      • 0.50% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.80% fail on Vehicle structure (60% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Chassis (60% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Spare wheel (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Body security
    • 0.10% fail on Load security
      • 0.10% fail on Loading door
  • 5.2% fail on Steering (29% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Steering system
      • 2.5% fail on Steering rack (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end (58% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Free play
        • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.40% fail on Steering control
      • 0.40% fail on Steering column (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering (79% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Drive system
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
    • 0.10% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Requirements
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.80% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.70% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.60% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment
    • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Hubs
  • 0.30% fail on Towbars
    • 0.30% fail on Vehicle structure