Volkswagen Caddy MOT Results

Registered in 2004
51.9% pass rate
from 2,065 tests in 2017
(6.2% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caddy is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (59% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (66% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (92% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.048% fail on Condition
    • 6.5% fail on Drive shafts (47% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Front drive shafts (48% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 6.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (47% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.097% fail on Couplings
        • 0.048% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.097% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.097% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Coil springs (75% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Condition (80% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.097% fail on Location
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Front
      • 0.39% fail on Rear
    • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (82% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.48% fail on Component mounting (87% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Spring mounting (95% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Front suspension joints (62% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.097% fail on General condition
    • 0.097% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment
    • 0.048% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.048% fail on Condition
    • 0.048% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.048% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.048% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.048% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.048% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (22% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 8.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (22% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp (33% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.0% fail on Individual lamps (47% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Side repeaters (54% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.048% fail on Switch
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps (54% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Front lamps (57% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps (52% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.048% fail on Switch
    • 0.92% fail on Horn (55% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Battery (45% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Fog lamp (77% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.048% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.048% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.048% fail on Lamp
  • 17% fail on Brakes (18% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 9.2% fail on Brake performance (20% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (44% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance (57% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.097% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (34% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Components (38% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Pipes (80% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Valves (58% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Servos (19 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.048% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.48% fail on Leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.048% fail on Operation
    • 3.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.82% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.19% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.097% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.048% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.2% fail on ABS
    • 0.97% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.97% fail on Condition
    • 0.58% fail on Electronic stability system (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.34% fail on Air and vacuum systems (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Components (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Servos (15 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Leaks
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake control components (72% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal (72% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.048% fail on Linkage
      • 0.048% fail on Lever
      • 0.048% fail on Cable
  • 9.9% fail on Driver's view of the road (17% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (31% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.63% fail on Bonnet (170% worse than other 2004 vans)
  • 8.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
    • 0.048% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust system (39% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.77% fail on System (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.097% fail on Tank
      • 0.097% fail on Cap
      • 0.048% fail on Pipe
    • 0.92% fail on Emissions
    • 0.63% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (38% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts (33% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.048% fail on Requirements
      • 0.048% fail on Attachment
    • 0.77% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (54% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (50% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 3.0% fail on Steering (57% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Steering system (61% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Track rod end (76% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Free play
        • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.19% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.048% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.63% fail on Power steering
      • 0.39% fail on Electronic power steering (43 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.048% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.048% fail on Other components
    • 0.19% fail on Steering control
      • 0.097% fail on Steering column
      • 0.048% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.048% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.048% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.048% fail on Steering operation
  • 2.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (63% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Body condition (76% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Doors
      • 0.29% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.19% fail on Drivers
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.34% fail on Vehicle structure (81% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Chassis (81% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Seats
      • 0.24% fail on Drivers
      • 0.097% fail on Passengers
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.097% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.048% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.048% fail on Load security
      • 0.048% fail on Access panel
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 0.097% fail on Towbars
    • 0.097% fail on Towbar