Volkswagen Caddy MOT Results

Registered in 2010
63.9% pass rate
from 9,977 tests in 2020
(14% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caddy is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 9.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (78% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (33% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.020% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms (14% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (60% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Springs (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Coil springs (35% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Coil spring (35% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Mounting
      • 0.080% fail on Leaf springs (94% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.070% fail on Leaf spring (92% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.010% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (43% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Wheel bearings (32% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint (94% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.070% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.050% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.020% fail on Sub-frame
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp (27% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (17% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (15% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.020% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.92% fail on Direction indicators (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Flashing type (66% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.66% fail on Individual direction indicators (64% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Side repeaters (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on All direction indicators (78% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Position lamps (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Position lamp (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.43% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.010% fail on Switch
    • 0.38% fail on Electrical equipment (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Horn (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.040% fail on Rear reflectors (88% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.67% fail on View to rear
      • 0.67% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.51% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.50% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.010% fail on Window
    • 0.28% fail on Bonnet (82% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.4% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.040% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.070% fail on Cable (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Lever
        • 0.010% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (26% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.010% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.010% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.67% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (32% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt (sp) (30% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (83% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.030% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.71% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.65% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.26% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.070% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.020% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.010% fail on Servos
      • 0.010% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.080% fail on Flexible brake hoses (67% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.070% fail on Parking brake control (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Lever (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.060% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Hand lever (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Pedal (96% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.050% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.020% fail on Rigid brake pipes (99% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.010% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.010% fail on Leaks
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth (20% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Condition (43% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.050% fail on Size/type (74% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 5.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (68% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.050% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.050% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.040% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.020% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.020% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.48% fail on Spark ignition (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.020% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.010% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.23% fail on Fluid leaks (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.010% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.020% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.020% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 3.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (59% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (61% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.070% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts (67% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.050% fail on Tank
      • 0.050% fail on Pipe
      • 0.050% fail on System
      • 0.020% fail on Hose
    • 0.28% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
      • 0.10% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.090% fail on Door condition
        • 0.010% fail on Hinge
      • 0.020% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.020% fail on Door condition
    • 0.12% fail on Body (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Other body component (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Panel
      • 0.010% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.090% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.080% fail on Seats (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Driver's seat (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.050% fail on Undertray
    • 0.040% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.030% fail on Carrier
      • 0.010% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.010% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.010% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.010% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.010% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.010% fail on Load security
      • 0.010% fail on Access panel
    • 0.010% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.010% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 0.77% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (46% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Attachment
      • 0.020% fail on Requirements
      • 0.020% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.040% fail on Airbags
      • 0.040% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.70% fail on Steering (85% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Steering linkage components (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Other components
        • 0.010% fail on Steering component
      • 0.010% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
      • 0.060% fail on Operation
      • 0.060% fail on Pipes and hoses (64% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Steering gear (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Steering rack (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Operation
    • 0.040% fail on Steering play (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Steering rack (73% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Registration plates (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.010% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.010% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.010% fail on Anchorages