Volkswagen Caddy MOT Results

Registered in 2010
67.9% pass rate
from 8,530 tests in 2017
(19% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caddy is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (31% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (16% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp (21% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.012% fail on Switch
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Rear lamps (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Front lamps (90% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Flashing type (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Individual lamps (87% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (75% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on All direction indicators (78% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.023% fail on Switch
        • 0.012% fail on Tell tales
      • 0.012% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.012% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Fog lamp (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Horn (58% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Battery
    • 0.047% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.035% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.035% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.012% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.8% fail on Suspension (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (40% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Attachment (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Linkage condition (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.012% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (38% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.90% fail on Coil springs (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Location
    • 0.66% fail on Drive shafts (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Front drive shafts (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Constant velocity joints (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.012% fail on Couplings
    • 0.63% fail on Wheel bearings (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Front (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Rear
    • 0.18% fail on Front suspension joints (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.070% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.059% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment
    • 0.035% fail on General condition
    • 0.035% fail on Leaf springs (95% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.023% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.023% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.023% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.023% fail on Condition
    • 0.012% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.012% fail on Condition
    • 0.012% fail on Axles
      • 0.012% fail on Clearance
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres (34% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Condition (35% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
    • 0.14% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (20% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.68% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.35% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 6.2% fail on Brakes (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Hub components (18% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.64% fail on Brake discs (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Brake calipers (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear wheels (50% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.035% fail on Service brake performance (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.012% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.36% fail on ABS
    • 0.25% fail on Restricted movement (85% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems (93% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Components (94% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Hoses (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.012% fail on Pipes
      • 0.023% fail on Operation
      • 0.023% fail on Leaks (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.059% fail on Parking brake (93% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Condition (93% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 1.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.87% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Cap
      • 0.14% fail on System
      • 0.094% fail on Tank
      • 0.047% fail on Pipe
      • 0.012% fail on Hose
    • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.023% fail on Emissions
  • 0.56% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.082% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.070% fail on Drivers
    • 0.15% fail on Body condition (68% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.070% fail on Seats
      • 0.035% fail on Passengers
      • 0.035% fail on Drivers
    • 0.070% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.023% fail on Body security
    • 0.012% fail on Engine mountings
  • 0.55% fail on Steering (85% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Steering system (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Steering rack (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.059% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.023% fail on Other components
    • 0.012% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.55% fail on Registration plates and VIN (32% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Registration plate (32% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.50% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (61% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (54% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.22% fail on Seat belts (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Requirements
      • 0.012% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.094% fail on Attachment
  • 0.012% fail on Towbars
    • 0.012% fail on Towbar