MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Volkswagen » Caddy » 2010

Volkswagen Caddy MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.8% pass rate
from 9,504 tests in 2020
(12% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caddy is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension (6.2% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (80% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (18% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (26% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Linkage (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Anti-roll bar (0.033% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.9% fail on Suspension arms (1.7% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes (71% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (85% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Springs (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (25% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Coil spring (24% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Leaf springs (93% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.084% fail on Leaf spring (92% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.021% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers (25% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Wheel bearings (35% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Other suspension component (50% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9.0% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.084% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Pins and bushes (16% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint (93% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.084% fail on Suspension rods (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Macpherson strut (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.032% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (95% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.011% fail on Axles
      • 0.011% fail on Axle
    • 0.011% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (32% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp (21% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (11% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (7.1% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (59% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (36% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp levelling device (16% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (62% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Individual direction indicators (59% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (71% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on All direction indicators (58% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 0.58% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Switch (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Electrical equipment (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Horn (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Battery(ies) (16% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Trailer electrical socket (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps (67% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Position lamps (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Position lamp (61% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.032% fail on Rear reflectors (90% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.011% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 0.011% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.011% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres (28% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Condition (47% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type (5.4% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 7.8% fail on Brakes (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (18% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (4.8% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads (5.3% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.042% fail on Brake linings (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (27% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs (27% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.14% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (67% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Cable (64% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.021% fail on Lever (72% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Pivot
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (25% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (35% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance (2.8% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Plate brake tester (25% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.021% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.84% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.84% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (35% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp) (35% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance (16% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (79% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.042% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (74% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.042% fail on Plate brake tester (15% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.021% fail on Parking brake performance (23% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.021% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4.0% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Brake performance not tested (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (0.17% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6.4% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Electronic stability control (21% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Electronic braking system (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Parking brake control (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Lever (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Electronic parking brake (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.084% fail on Rigid brake pipes (98% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.074% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Pedal (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Hand lever (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.074% fail on Hydraulic systems (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Brake fluid (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.011% fail on Valves
    • 0.063% fail on Flexible brake hoses (73% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.053% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility (11% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Washers (2.0% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers (29% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on View to rear (0.088% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Mirrors (0.53% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.36% fail on Condition of glass (22% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Windscreen (20% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Bonnet (64% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.095% fail on Driver's view (8.5% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (9.3% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (5.8% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Compression ignition (7.5% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (9.8% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on Emission control equipment (94% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.032% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.011% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.011% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.032% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (71% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
      • 0.43% fail on Spark ignition (60% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Emissions not tested (4.2% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.021% fail on Catalyst emissions (67% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Fluid leaks (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Other leaks (18% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.042% fail on Noise suppression (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Sound deadening material (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Undertray
  • 4.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system (30% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (53% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Joints (55% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.084% fail on Drive shaft (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.053% fail on Prop shafts (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Belts
    • 0.28% fail on Doors (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Front passenger's door (2.3% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition (1.4% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Catch
      • 0.095% fail on Other passenger's door (39% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.095% fail on Door condition (31% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Driver's door (67% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Door condition (70% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Catch
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers (4.6% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.084% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Pipe (17% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Tank
    • 0.13% fail on Body (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Other body component (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Panel (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Body condition
    • 0.095% fail on Engine mounting (26% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Engine mounting condition (27% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Bracket (24% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.074% fail on Seats (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Driver's seat (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Passenger's seat (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Spare wheel (6.7% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Spare wheel condition (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Carrier (33% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.032% fail on Load security (24% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Loading door (24% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.011% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.011% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.011% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.011% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.011% fail on Undertray
  • 0.75% fail on Steering (85% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Ball joint (62% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Steering gear (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Steering box
    • 0.11% fail on Power steering (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Operation (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Other components (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.042% fail on Electronic power steering (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.021% fail on Steering wheel (19% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.011% fail on Steering column
    • 0.011% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.011% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.67% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Seat belts (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Attachment (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Prescribed areas (93% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Requirements
      • 0.011% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.33% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.032% fail on Airbags (7.0% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Drivers airbag (14% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle (32% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plates (32% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels (3.9% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment (0.033% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.074% fail on Condition (16% worse than other 2010 vans)