MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Volkswagen » Caddy » 2010

Volkswagen Caddy MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.0% pass rate
from 9,805 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caddy is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (70% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.071% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 6.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes (72% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.031% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.0% fail on Springs (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.8% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.051% fail on Mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Leaf springs (92% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Leaf spring (91% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.010% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.010% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 0.031% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings (31% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Shock absorbers (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Other suspension component (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.061% fail on Ball joint (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.010% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut (50% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.061% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.082% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (93% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.071% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.010% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.010% fail on Axles
      • 0.010% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.010% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.010% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.010% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.010% fail on Operation
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (33% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (29% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (72% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (49% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (47% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Side repeaters (57% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.061% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.010% fail on Switch
    • 0.55% fail on Electrical equipment (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Battery(ies) (90% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Horn (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.020% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.49% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps (60% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Position lamps (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Position lamp (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.041% fail on All position lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Rear reflectors (94% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.010% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.010% fail on Switch
  • 9.5% fail on Brakes (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (69% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.051% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (74% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (34% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.66% fail on Rbt (sp) (34% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.010% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.66% fail on Rbt (65% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.031% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (12% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.020% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (25% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs (24% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.082% fail on Cable (74% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.010% fail on Lever
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.51% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.010% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.10% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Pedal (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Hand lever (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.041% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.041% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.020% fail on Valves
    • 0.10% fail on Rigid brake pipes (97% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.092% fail on Parking brake control (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Lever (83% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.051% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.041% fail on Servos
      • 0.010% fail on Operation
    • 0.010% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.010% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.010% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers (32% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on View to rear
      • 0.70% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.63% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.63% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.010% fail on Window
    • 0.35% fail on Bonnet (84% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth (20% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Condition (30% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 4.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (21% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (17% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.082% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.051% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.020% fail on Other emission control equipment
          • 0.010% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.061% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.051% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.051% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.54% fail on Spark ignition (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.020% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.020% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve (16 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.18% fail on Fluid leaks (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.041% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.010% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.010% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.010% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 4.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts (46% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Joints (46% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.051% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.031% fail on Prop shafts (94% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Joints (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Halfshafts
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.38% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
        • 0.010% fail on Hinge
      • 0.13% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
      • 0.11% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.23% fail on Fuel system (50% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.051% fail on Pipe
      • 0.031% fail on Tank
      • 0.020% fail on Hose
      • 0.020% fail on System
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.092% fail on Body (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Other body component (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Panel (73% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.082% fail on Seats (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.031% fail on Driver's seat (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.071% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.051% fail on Carrier
      • 0.041% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.061% fail on Integral vehicle structure (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (92% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.061% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.041% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.020% fail on Bracket
    • 0.051% fail on Chassis (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Chassis condition (89% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.010% fail on Towbar
      • 0.010% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.010% fail on Load security
      • 0.010% fail on Loading door
    • 0.010% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.010% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.010% fail on Passenger compartment
    • 0.010% fail on Undertray
  • 0.73% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Steering linkage components (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.010% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.20% fail on Steering gear (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Operation
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Pipes and hoses (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Other components
      • 0.041% fail on Operation (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Pump
    • 0.010% fail on Steering play
      • 0.010% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.010% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.71% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (71% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Seat belts (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Prescribed areas (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.041% fail on Attachment
      • 0.020% fail on Requirements
    • 0.30% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Airbags
      • 0.031% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment