Volkswagen Camper MOT Results

Registered in 2009
57.7% pass rate
from 52 tests in 2020
(5.0% better than other 2009 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Camper is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (8.9% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 13% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (2.8% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (11% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators (48% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type (48% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (25% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (63% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Chassis (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Chassis condition (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Fuel system (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (18 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Towbar
      • 1.9% fail on Other towbar components
      • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 1.9% fail on Engine mounting
      • 1.9% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 1.9% fail on Body
      • 1.9% fail on Other body component
    • 1.9% fail on Doors
      • 1.9% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 1.9% fail on Door condition
  • 7.7% fail on Brakes (48% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Brake performance (28% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (28% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (27% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 1.9% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.9% fail on Pedal
  • 7.7% fail on Steering (63% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Steering play (48 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Steering box (634 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.9% fail on Steering box
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility (8.5% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers (44% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Washers (3.7% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (13% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (7.9% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Spark ignition (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (39 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.9% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.8% fail on Suspension (76% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.9% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.9% fail on Other suspension component
  • 3.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (62% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Seat belts (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 1.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres
    • 1.9% fail on Condition