Volkswagen Camper MOT Results
Registered in 200971.4% pass rate
from 105 tests in 2021
(41% better than other 2009 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Camper is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
5.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 5.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
5.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.9% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.9% fail on Horn
-
0.95% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.95% fail on Headlamp
-
5.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
9.5% fail on
Brakes
-
7.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.95% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 1.9% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.95% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.95% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.8% fail on
Service brake performance
- 0.95% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.95% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.95% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.95% fail on Load sensing valves
-
7.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.6% fail on
Visibility
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
- 3.8% fail on Washers
-
7.6% fail on
Suspension
(57% better than other 2009 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.95% fail on Ball joint
-
1.9% fail on
Springs
-
1.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.9% fail on Coil spring
-
1.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.95% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.95% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.8% fail on
Suspension arms
-
5.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
1.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.9% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.9% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.95% fail on
Body
- 0.95% fail on Body condition
-
0.95% fail on
Doors
-
0.95% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.95% fail on Door condition
-
0.95% fail on
Driver's door
-
1.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
4.8% fail on
Steering
-
3.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.95% fail on Locking devices
-
1.9% fail on
Steering play
(10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Steering box (134 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.95% fail on
Power steering
- 0.95% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.95% fail on Steering shaft
-
3.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.95% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.95% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.95% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.95% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.95% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.9% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.9% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
1.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.95% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.95% fail on Registration plates
-
0.95% fail on
Tyres
- 0.95% fail on Condition