MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Volkswagen » Camper » 2010

Volkswagen Camper MOT Results

Registered in 2010
64.4% pass rate
from 118 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Camper is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Horn
      • 0.85% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.85% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.85% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.85% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.85% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.85% fail on Position lamp
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.85% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.85% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.85% fail on Pedal
      • 0.85% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.85% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.85% fail on Valves
    • 1.7% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (48 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers
    • 6.8% fail on Washers
  • 7.6% fail on Suspension (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.7% fail on Axles (19 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on King pins (426 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.85% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.85% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.85% fail on Operation
  • 5.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Drag link end (24 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.85% fail on Steering play
      • 0.85% fail on Steering box
  • 5.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.9% fail on Spark ignition (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (42 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested (37 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  • 4.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.85% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.85% fail on Transmission
      • 0.85% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.85% fail on Joints
  • 2.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
      • 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.85% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.85% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.85% fail on Attachment