MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Volkswagen » Crafter » 2010
Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks

Volkswagen Crafter MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.0% pass rate
from 2,364 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Crafter is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (35% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim (33% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Front lamps (24% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.42% fail on All position lamps (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.93% fail on Individual lamps (47% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.2% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.1% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Horn
    • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.042% fail on Battery
    • 0.042% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 19% fail on Brakes (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Rear wheels (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Front wheels (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.1% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Components (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Pipes
        • 0.76% fail on Hoses (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.042% fail on Leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads (31% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.085% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.42% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.42% fail on Pedal
        • 0.30% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Anti-slip (78% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.30% fail on Cable
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage
      • 0.042% fail on Lever
      • 0.042% fail on Pivot
    • 0.21% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.21% fail on ABS
    • 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.042% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.042% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.042% fail on Components
        • 0.042% fail on Servos
      • 0.042% fail on Leaks
    • 0.042% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.042% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 12% fail on Suspension (15% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.8% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Leaf springs (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Securing bolts (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Anchor bracket (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Shackle bracket (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Spring saddle (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (36% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.34% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.21% fail on Wheel bearings (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Front (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Rear
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.085% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.042% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.042% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.042% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.042% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.042% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.042% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.042% fail on Drive shafts
  • 8.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Windscreen (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.042% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.4% fail on Steering (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Steering system (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Steering arm (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Free play (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.085% fail on Other components
        • 0.085% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.34% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.042% fail on Pump
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (30% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.085% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.042% fail on Size/type
  • 2.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (87% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.042% fail on Drivers
    • 0.042% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.042% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.042% fail on Chassis
    • 0.042% fail on Body security
    • 0.042% fail on Seats
      • 0.042% fail on Drivers
    • 0.042% fail on Load security
      • 0.042% fail on Loading door
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.85% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.80% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.042% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
      • 0.085% fail on Attachment
      • 0.042% fail on Requirements
      • 0.042% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.55% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.55% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.38% fail on System
      • 0.085% fail on Pipe
      • 0.042% fail on Tank
      • 0.042% fail on Cap
    • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.085% fail on Towbars
    • 0.085% fail on Towbar
  • 0.085% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.042% fail on Condition
    • 0.042% fail on Attachment
  • 0.042% fail on Driving Controls and Speed Limiters
    • 0.042% fail on Speed limiter plate