Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Volkswagen Crafter MOT Results
Registered in 201059.0% pass rate
from 2,364 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Crafter is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (35% better than other 2010 vans)
- 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim (33% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.2% fail on Front lamps (24% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.42% fail on All position lamps (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp
- 3.5% fail on Stop lamp (42% better than other 2010 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.93% fail on Individual lamps (47% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.2% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.13% fail on Tell tale
- 2.1% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Horn
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.042% fail on Battery
- 0.042% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
19% fail on
Brakes
(63% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(170% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 12% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Rear wheels (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Front wheels (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.1% fail on
Parking brake
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(38% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Components
(36% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Pipes
- 0.76% fail on Hoses (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.042% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.042% fail on Leaks
-
3.5% fail on
Components
(36% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Hub components
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads (31% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
- 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.085% fail on Brake back plates
-
0.42% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.42% fail on
Pedal
- 0.30% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Anti-slip (78% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.42% fail on
Pedal
-
0.42% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.30% fail on Cable
- 0.042% fail on Linkage
- 0.042% fail on Lever
- 0.042% fail on Pivot
- 0.21% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.21% fail on ABS
- 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.042% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.042% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
0.042% fail on
Components
- 0.042% fail on Servos
- 0.042% fail on Leaks
-
0.042% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.042% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(170% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(15% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
- 0.042% fail on Linkage condition
-
3.8% fail on
Shock absorbers
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Leaf springs
(140% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Securing bolts (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Anchor bracket (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Shackle bracket (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Spring saddle (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(36% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.34% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.34% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.21% fail on
Wheel bearings
(81% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Front (81% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.042% fail on Rear
-
0.13% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.13% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.085% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.042% fail on Component mounting
- 0.042% fail on Spring mounting
-
0.042% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.042% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.042% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.042% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.042% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.042% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
4.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
8.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.5% fail on Wipers
- 2.1% fail on Windscreen (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Washers (34% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Mirrors
- 0.042% fail on Bonnet
-
7.4% fail on
Steering
(97% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
7.2% fail on
Steering system
(120% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.7% fail on Track rod end (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.63% fail on Steering arm (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.59% fail on
Free play
(4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.59% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Steering rack
- 0.13% fail on Drag link end
-
0.085% fail on
Other components
- 0.085% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.34% fail on
Power steering
- 0.21% fail on Other components
- 0.13% fail on Operation
- 0.042% fail on Pump
-
7.2% fail on
Steering system
(120% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
(30% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth (43% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.085% fail on Valve stem
- 0.042% fail on Size/type
-
2.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(87% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.17% fail on
Doors
- 0.13% fail on Passengers other
- 0.042% fail on Drivers
- 0.042% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.042% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.042% fail on Chassis
- 0.042% fail on Body security
-
0.042% fail on
Seats
- 0.042% fail on Drivers
-
0.042% fail on
Load security
- 0.042% fail on Loading door
-
1.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.85% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.80% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.042% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.47% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.34% fail on Condition
- 0.085% fail on Attachment
- 0.042% fail on Requirements
- 0.042% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.85% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
1.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 0.55% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.55% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.38% fail on System
- 0.085% fail on Pipe
- 0.042% fail on Tank
- 0.042% fail on Cap
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.085% fail on
Towbars
- 0.085% fail on Towbar
-
0.085% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.042% fail on Condition
- 0.042% fail on Attachment
-
0.042% fail on
Driving Controls and Speed Limiters
- 0.042% fail on Speed limiter plate