Volkswagen Crafter MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.5% pass rate
from 2,222 tests in 2020
(1.2% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Crafter is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 15% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (79% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.45% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.36% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on Plate brake tester (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.090% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.045% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (70% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (18% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Rbt (sp) (14% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.72% fail on Service brake performance (43% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.045% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested (24% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (16% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (16% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs (30% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (50% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.59% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (43% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Cable (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Lever (80% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Parking brake control (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5.2% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Electronic stability control (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Anti-lock braking system (48% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (38% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Pedal (30% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.36% fail on Flexible brake hoses (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic systems (1.9% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Servos (18 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Valves
    • 0.090% fail on Air and vacuum systems (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Servos (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Other components
      • 0.045% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.045% fail on Other braking system component
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (7.9% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp (34% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Headlamp levelling device (50% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (0.79% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (2.7% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (45% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators (28% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type (28% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (17% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (6.4% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (6.5% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (7.8% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Electrical equipment (12% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Horn (9.2% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Electrical wiring (8.1% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Position lamps (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Position lamp (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Outline marker lamps (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Outline marker lamp (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.045% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.045% fail on Switch
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust emissions (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Compression ignition (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (69% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested (0.96% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Emission control equipment (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.14% fail on Other emission control equipment (22 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.045% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.045% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.045% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.045% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.045% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.045% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 4.1% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Fluid leaks (25% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Engine oil leaks (51% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Other leaks
  • 9.7% fail on Suspension (37% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (24% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joints (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Linkage
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint (17% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint dust cover (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Springs (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Leaf springs (44% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on Anchor bracket (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.045% fail on Spring saddle
        • 0.045% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.41% fail on Other suspension component (23% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint (27% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Suspension rods (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.14% fail on Axles (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Axle (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames (3.3% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Macpherson strut (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.045% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 8.1% fail on Steering (64% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Steering linkage components (66% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Track rod end (60% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on Steering linkage (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.81% fail on Steering gear (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Steering rack (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Operation
    • 0.63% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Operation (27% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Other components (24% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.045% fail on Steering column
  • 6.0% fail on Visibility (26% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on View to rear (17% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Mirrors (13% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.86% fail on Condition of glass (86% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Windscreen (80% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Window
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view (30% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres (23% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (35% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Condition (3.7% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type (4.8% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 3.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (46% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Other body component (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Panel (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust system (20% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Transmission (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Prop shafts (70% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Prop shaft (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Joints (0.017% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on Flexible couplings (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.32% fail on Spare wheel (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Carrier (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.32% fail on Doors (24% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Other passenger's door (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Front passenger's door (37% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Door condition
        • 0.045% fail on Pillar
    • 0.23% fail on Seats (11% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Driver's seat (35% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.18% fail on Load security (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Loading door (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Dropside
        • 0.045% fail on Dropside condition
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers (23% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Integral vehicle structure (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (77% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.045% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.045% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.045% fail on Towbar
      • 0.045% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.045% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.045% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.045% fail on Undertray
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (15% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (65% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Seat belts (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Requirements
    • 0.045% fail on Airbags
      • 0.045% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle (1.4% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates (0.40% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels (1.3% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment (6.9% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.045% fail on Condition
  • 0.14% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Steps and stairs (18 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Retractable steps (30 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.045% fail on Doors
      • 0.045% fail on Emergency exits
  • 0.045% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.045% fail on Speed limiter
      • 0.045% fail on Speed limiter plate