MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Volkswagen » Transporter » 2000

Volkswagen Transporter MOT Results

Registered in 2000
51.6% pass rate
from 4,969 tests in 2021
(4.0% worse than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Transporter is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (8.1% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim (62% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 8.0% fail on Headlamp aim (65% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (22% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (22% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (22% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp (22% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device (71% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.9% fail on Horn (44% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Battery(ies) (50% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators (21% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type (21% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.36% fail on Side repeaters (60% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.060% fail on Switch
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (27% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.020% fail on Switch
    • 0.40% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.10% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.080% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.020% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.080% fail on Hazard warning (69% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Switch (69% better than other 2000 vans)
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (17% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (18% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (25% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.040% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.040% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.080% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.060% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance (56% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (57% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (63% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.040% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.060% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.020% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.020% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (69% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (55% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (55% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.0% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Cable (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Lever
        • 0.040% fail on Linkage
        • 0.020% fail on Pivot
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.93% fail on Flexible brake hoses (61% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.42% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.060% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.060% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.040% fail on Servos
      • 0.040% fail on Valves
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
      • 0.020% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.28% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.28% fail on Lever
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.020% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.12% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.12% fail on Servos
    • 0.12% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (72% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas (83% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.040% fail on Other braking system component (81% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.040% fail on Other components
      • 0.020% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.10% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.10% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.020% fail on Pressure storage reservoirs
      • 0.020% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (43% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage
      • 0.020% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 2.0% fail on Springs (25% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Coil springs (71% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Coil spring (73% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (82% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.020% fail on Torsion bar
        • 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component (49% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint dust cover (89% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.020% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.72% fail on Wheel bearings (57% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Sub-frames (38% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (36% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.54% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.040% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.020% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.020% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.020% fail on Bellows
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.8% fail on Transmission
      • 4.6% fail on Drive shafts (49% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Joints (50% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.080% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.040% fail on Bearing housing
        • 0.020% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts (88% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints
      • 0.040% fail on Belts
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure (28% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (27% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.020% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.8% fail on Doors (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Driver's door (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.040% fail on Catch
      • 0.80% fail on Front passenger's door (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Door condition (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Catch
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
        • 0.040% fail on Hinge
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis (46% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition (46% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Pipe
      • 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.10% fail on Hose
      • 0.060% fail on Tank
    • 0.46% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.26% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.44% fail on Body (56% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Panel
      • 0.14% fail on Other body component (67% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Body condition
      • 0.020% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.14% fail on Cabs (63% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas (63% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Steps
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
      • 0.060% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.060% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.060% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.060% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.060% fail on Floor
    • 0.040% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.040% fail on Carrier
    • 0.020% fail on Load security
      • 0.020% fail on Dropside
        • 0.020% fail on Dropside condition
    • 0.020% fail on Undertray
  • 9.9% fail on Steering (46% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Steering linkage components (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Track rod end (62% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.040% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.020% fail on Steering arm
    • 3.9% fail on Steering gear (72% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Steering rack (75% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Operation
    • 0.99% fail on Power steering
      • 0.40% fail on Operation
      • 0.26% fail on Other components
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.12% fail on Pump
      • 0.080% fail on Rams
    • 0.26% fail on Steering wheel (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Steering column
    • 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.060% fail on Steering play
      • 0.060% fail on Steering rack
  • 8.4% fail on Visibility (18% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (16% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Washers (23% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on View to rear
      • 0.42% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.26% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (17% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (24% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Compression ignition (56% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (78% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (47% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Emission control equipment (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.12% fail on Catalytic converter (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.10% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
          • 0.040% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.080% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.52% fail on Spark ignition (51% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Catalyst emissions (54% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.020% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.76% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.060% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.040% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
      • 0.24% fail on Requirements
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.020% fail on Airbags
      • 0.020% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.50% fail on Road Wheels (80% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Attachment
    • 0.060% fail on Condition
  • 0.040% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.020% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.020% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.020% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.020% fail on Speedometer