Ford Transit MOT Results
Registered in 199056.2% pass rate
from 644 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Transit is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(42% worse than other 1990 vans)
-
18% fail on
Prescribed areas
(95% worse than other 1990 vans)
- 10% fail on Component mounting (62% worse than other 1990 vans)
- 10% fail on Spring mounting (190% worse than other 1990 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Subframe mounting
-
3.0% fail on
Shock absorbers
(130% worse than other 1990 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 1990 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 2.5% fail on Front
- 0.16% fail on Rear
-
1.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.31% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Leaf springs
-
0.93% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 0.78% fail on Shackle
- 0.16% fail on Anchor
- 0.31% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.16% fail on Shackle bracket
-
0.93% fail on
Pins and bushes
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.47% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.31% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.78% fail on
Axles
- 0.62% fail on King pins (2 times worse than other 1990 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Stub axle
- 0.78% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.16% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.16% fail on Condition
-
0.16% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.16% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.16% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.16% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
-
18% fail on
Prescribed areas
(95% worse than other 1990 vans)
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.3% fail on Battery (110% worse than other 1990 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.47% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.31% fail on Switch
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
3.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 2.0% fail on Front lamps
-
3.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.1% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.78% fail on Tell tale
- 0.47% fail on Switch
- 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.16% fail on Switch
- 0.62% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.62% fail on Horn (69% better than other 1990 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.31% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.16% fail on Lamp
- 0.16% fail on Tell tale
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
- 6.4% fail on Rear wheels
- 5.4% fail on Front wheels
- 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(35% better than other 1990 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Components
(46% better than other 1990 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Pipes
- 1.2% fail on Valves
- 0.47% fail on Hoses (84% better than other 1990 vans)
- 0.93% fail on Leaks
- 0.47% fail on Operation
-
3.7% fail on
Components
(46% better than other 1990 vans)
-
0.93% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.93% fail on
Pedal
- 0.47% fail on Condition
- 0.47% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.93% fail on
Pedal
-
0.93% fail on
Hub components
- 0.78% fail on Brake pads
- 0.31% fail on Brake discs
- 0.31% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.31% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.16% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.16% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.16% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.16% fail on Condition
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(64% worse than other 1990 vans)
- 6.5% fail on Body condition (82% worse than other 1990 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
(75% worse than other 1990 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Chassis (75% worse than other 1990 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Seats
- 1.6% fail on Drivers
- 0.78% fail on Passengers
-
0.62% fail on
Doors
- 0.47% fail on Passengers front
- 0.16% fail on Drivers
- 0.31% fail on Speedometer
- 0.31% fail on Body security
- 0.31% fail on Spare wheel
-
0.16% fail on
Load security
- 0.16% fail on Loading door
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.9% fail on Washers
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.2% fail on Windscreen
- 0.78% fail on Mirrors
- 0.31% fail on Bonnet
- 0.16% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
9.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 4.2% fail on Emissions
-
2.0% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.4% fail on Cap
- 0.47% fail on Tank
- 0.47% fail on System
- 0.16% fail on Hose
- 0.62% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.7% fail on
Steering
-
6.2% fail on
Steering system
- 3.1% fail on Steering rack
- 2.2% fail on Track rod end
-
0.47% fail on
Free play
- 0.47% fail on Steering box
- 0.47% fail on Steering box (4 times worse than other 1990 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Drag link end
- 0.78% fail on Steering operation
- 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.62% fail on
Power steering
- 0.31% fail on Other components
- 0.16% fail on Operation
- 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.16% fail on
Steering control
-
0.16% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.16% fail on Universal joint
-
0.16% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.16% fail on Locking devices
-
6.2% fail on
Steering system
-
5.6% fail on
Tyres
- 3.9% fail on Condition
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth
- 0.31% fail on Size/type
- 0.16% fail on Valve stem
-
5.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.62% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on Attachment
- 0.16% fail on Requirements
-
5.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate
-
0.62% fail on
Towbars
- 0.62% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.31% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Attachment