Ford Transit MOT Results

Registered in 1992
58.8% pass rate
from 432 tests in 2020
(10% better than other 1992 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Transit is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (95% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Springs (150% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Leaf springs (200% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Leaf spring (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (130% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms (34% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint (5.1% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (51% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings (25% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (13% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames (150% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (110% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.69% fail on Other suspension component (37% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint (74% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.23% fail on Axles
      • 0.23% fail on King pins
    • 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.23% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (27% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Direction indicators (9.3% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Flashing type (9.3% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (0.61% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Side repeaters (36% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on All direction indicators (10.0% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Switch
    • 5.1% fail on Electrical equipment (14% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Battery(ies) (140% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Horn (65% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp (5.0% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps (34% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp (32% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (63% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (23% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Hazard warning (18% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Switch (18% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.23% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.23% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Brakes (8.1% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (4.6% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance (4.1% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (5.8% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance (1.9% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (11% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (7.4% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (5.6% better than other 1992 vans)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (2.6% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (24% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (38% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (45% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (74% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (79% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 1992 vans)
          • 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake performance not tested (31% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (21% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Brake discs and drums (64% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Brake discs (31% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.46% fail on Brake linings and pads (7.1% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Brake pads (0.50% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (0.50% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Cable
        • 0.23% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (53% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (16% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Pedal (55% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Parking brake control (86% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Lever (86% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Load sensing valves (49% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (160% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.23% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
    • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic systems (39% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.23% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (14% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Chassis (56% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Chassis condition (56% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (12% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (12% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system (35% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Body (130% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Panel (110% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system (12% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (61% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Pipe
      • 0.23% fail on System
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission (76% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Prop shaft (4 times worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.23% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.93% fail on Towbar (180% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Vehicle structure (160% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.69% fail on Seats (0.50% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Driver's seat (31% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Doors (13% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Front passenger's door (16% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition (16% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.23% fail on Floor
  • 10% fail on Visibility (3.3% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Washers (43% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (31% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.23% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.2% fail on Steering (30% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Steering gear (50% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Steering rack (44% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
    • 3.0% fail on Steering linkage components (10% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end (20% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Drag link end (99% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering (74% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Operation (27% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
    • 0.46% fail on Steering play (74% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Steering rack (180% worse than other 1992 vans)
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres (96% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth (180% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (28% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 4.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (23% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Seat belts (23% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas (53% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Requirements
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (29% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (27% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition (33% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested (99% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (27% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 1.9% fail on Spark ignition (52% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.93% fail on Non catalyst emissions (50% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Catalyst emissions (60% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Emissions not tested (44% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Fluid leaks (50% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Engine oil leaks (30% better than other 1992 vans)
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle (55% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates (82% worse than other 1992 vans)
  • 0.46% fail on Road Wheels (39% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Attachment (74% worse than other 1992 vans)