Ford Transit MOT Results
Registered in 199657.2% pass rate
from 1,471 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Transit is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Suspension
(15% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (43% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
3.9% fail on
Springs
(91% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Leaf springs
(180% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.14% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.14% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.14% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
- 0.14% fail on Shackle bracket
- 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (95% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.3% fail on Coil spring
-
1.4% fail on
Leaf springs
(180% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings (66% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover (59% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Suspension arm (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.068% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.82% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.068% fail on Linkage
-
0.75% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.75% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.54% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.48% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.068% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.068% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.068% fail on
Axles
- 0.068% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
0.068% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.068% fail on Pins and bushes
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(17% better than other 1996 vans)
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamps
(44% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 5.6% fail on Headlamp (51% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Dipswitch
- 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(31% better than other 1996 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.82% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (150% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.34% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.4% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.4% fail on Battery(ies) (79% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.82% fail on Horn (73% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.54% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.068% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(51% better than other 1996 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(51% better than other 1996 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (51% better than other 1996 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(51% better than other 1996 vans)
-
0.48% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.48% fail on Switch
-
0.34% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.27% fail on Position lamp
- 0.068% fail on All position lamps
-
0.27% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.20% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.068% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamps
(44% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
17% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
5.6% fail on
Chassis
(68% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 5.6% fail on Chassis condition (69% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.068% fail on Strengthening plate
-
4.7% fail on
Transmission
(40% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Prop shafts
(3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Prop shaft (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.54% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Flexible couplings (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Bearing housing (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
0.14% fail on
Drive shafts
(94% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Joints (94% better than other 1996 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Prop shafts
(3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 4.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.88% fail on
Body
- 0.61% fail on Panel
- 0.20% fail on Other body component
- 0.068% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.88% fail on
Seats
- 0.82% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.82% fail on
Doors
-
0.48% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.48% fail on Door condition
-
0.34% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.34% fail on Door condition
-
0.48% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.68% fail on
Cabs
- 0.61% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.068% fail on Steps
-
0.61% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.14% fail on Pipe
- 0.14% fail on System
- 0.068% fail on Hose
- 0.14% fail on Bumpers
-
0.14% fail on
Towbar
- 0.068% fail on Towbar condition
- 0.068% fail on Vehicle structure
- 0.14% fail on Floor
- 0.14% fail on Passenger compartment
-
0.068% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.068% fail on Carrier
-
5.6% fail on
Chassis
(68% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
(15% better than other 1996 vans)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
6.0% fail on
Rbt
- 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.27% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
6.0% fail on
Rbt
-
5.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 4.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.3% fail on
Service brake performance
- 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (40% better than other 1996 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.88% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.88% fail on Brake discs
-
0.48% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.41% fail on Cable
- 0.068% fail on Pivot
-
0.27% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.27% fail on Brake pads
-
0.88% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.82% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.68% fail on Pedal
- 0.14% fail on Hand lever
- 0.68% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.48% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.27% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.068% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
- 0.34% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.34% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.34% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.20% fail on Other braking system component
- 0.068% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.068% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.34% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.27% fail on Lever
-
0.27% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.27% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.14% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.068% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.068% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.068% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.068% fail on Servos
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.2% fail on
Visibility
- 4.9% fail on Washers
- 3.9% fail on Wipers (32% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.82% fail on Bonnet
-
0.41% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.41% fail on Windscreen
-
0.20% fail on
View to rear
- 0.20% fail on Mirrors
-
5.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(34% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Seat belts
(36% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas (45% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
- 0.068% fail on Requirements
- 0.068% fail on Pre-tensioners
-
5.9% fail on
Seat belts
(36% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Steering
-
1.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
- 0.068% fail on Locking devices
-
1.3% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
- 0.14% fail on Operation
-
0.95% fail on
Power steering
- 0.48% fail on Operation
- 0.27% fail on Other components
- 0.068% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.068% fail on Pump
- 0.068% fail on Rams
-
0.34% fail on
Steering play
- 0.34% fail on Steering rack
- 0.14% fail on Steering column
- 0.068% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.8% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
-
3.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(31% better than other 1996 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(38% better than other 1996 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.27% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.068% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.068% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
-
0.41% fail on
Spark ignition
(79% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Catalyst emissions (72% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.068% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
2.0% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.0% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.95% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.068% fail on Other leaks
-
0.068% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.068% fail on Undertray
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(38% better than other 1996 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates
- 0.068% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
-
0.068% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.068% fail on Speedometer
-
0.068% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.068% fail on Anchorages