Isuzu NKR MOT Results

Registered in 2003
49.4% pass rate
from 166 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu NKR is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 14% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Fog lamp (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.60% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.60% fail on Front lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Battery
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.60% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.60% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Horn
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 6.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.0% fail on Components
        • 5.4% fail on Pipes
        • 2.4% fail on Hoses
        • 1.2% fail on Reservoirs (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Valves
      • 0.60% fail on Leaks
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.60% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.60% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.60% fail on Pedal
        • 0.60% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.60% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.60% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
  • 16% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.4% fail on Washers
    • 7.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.8% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.6% fail on Tyres
    • 6.0% fail on Condition
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 9.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.4% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.8% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.4% fail on Suspension (67% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 4.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.60% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.60% fail on Shackle
    • 0.60% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.60% fail on Rear
  • 5.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Steering system
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.60% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.60% fail on Other components
        • 0.60% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.2% fail on Steering operation (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Power steering
      • 0.60% fail on Operation
  • 5.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
  • 1.8% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
  • 1.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (74% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.60% fail on Body security
    • 0.60% fail on Seats
      • 0.60% fail on Drivers
  • 1.2% fail on Towbars
    • 1.2% fail on Towbar (12 times worse than other 2003 vans)
  • 0.60% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.60% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.60% fail on Condition