Isuzu NKR MOT Results
Registered in 200460.2% pass rate
from 118 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu NKR is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 8.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
7.6% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(150% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
7.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(150% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 7.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
7.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(150% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.7% fail on All direction indicators (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp
- 0.85% fail on Dipswitch
- 0.85% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.7% fail on Position lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.85% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.85% fail on Battery(ies)
-
19% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
7.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
7.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
5.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.1% fail on
Rbt
- 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.85% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.85% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.1% fail on
Rbt
-
3.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.85% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.85% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
7.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.7% fail on Pedal
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.7% fail on Lever
- 1.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Visibility
- 11% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
-
1.7% fail on
View to rear
- 1.7% fail on Mirrors
-
0.85% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.85% fail on Windscreen
-
7.6% fail on
Tyres
- 4.2% fail on Condition
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
-
6.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.85% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.85% fail on Tank
- 0.85% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.85% fail on Bumpers
-
0.85% fail on
Transmission
-
0.85% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.85% fail on Prop shaft
-
0.85% fail on
Prop shafts
-
0.85% fail on
Cabs
- 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.9% fail on
Suspension
(72% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.85% fail on Ball joint
- 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
-
5.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Registration plates (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Steering
-
4.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 4.2% fail on Track rod end
-
4.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.7% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.85% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.85% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.85% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.85% fail on Condition
-
0.85% fail on
Seat belts