Isuzu NKR MOT Results

Registered in 2004
60.4% pass rate
from 154 tests in 2017
(23% better than other 2004 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu NKR is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.3% fail on All position lamps (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Switch (53 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.9% fail on Fog lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.65% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.65% fail on Switch
    • 0.65% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.65% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 5.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.5% fail on Components
        • 2.6% fail on Pipes
        • 1.3% fail on Hoses
        • 1.3% fail on Valves
      • 1.3% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal
        • 1.3% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.65% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.9% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.4% fail on Suspension (66% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Axles (19 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on King pins (39 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
      • 0.65% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.65% fail on Shackle
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (81% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.65% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.65% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.65% fail on Front
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 5.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 7.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Cap
      • 0.65% fail on Tank
  • 5.2% fail on Steering
    • 3.2% fail on Steering system
      • 3.2% fail on Track rod end
    • 2.6% fail on Steering operation (12 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering
      • 0.65% fail on Operation
      • 0.65% fail on Drive system
      • 0.65% fail on Pump
  • 3.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.6% fail on Body condition
    • 0.65% fail on Speedometer
  • 2.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Requirements (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.65% fail on Attachment
  • 1.9% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate