Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Isuzu NKR MOT Results

Registered in 2005
60.8% pass rate
from 143 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu NKR is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 17% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.3% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 6.3% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.70% fail on Tell tale
    • 4.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.70% fail on Tell tales
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.70% fail on Battery
    • 0.70% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 18% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 10% fail on Washers (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.70% fail on Mirrors
  • 10% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.3% fail on Components
        • 4.9% fail on Pipes
        • 0.70% fail on Hoses
        • 0.70% fail on Valves
      • 0.70% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.70% fail on Operation
      • 0.70% fail on Leaks
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.70% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 0.70% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
    • 0.70% fail on Hub components
      • 0.70% fail on Brake pads
  • 9.1% fail on Steering
    • 7.7% fail on Steering system
      • 4.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.4% fail on Drag link end (12 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.70% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.70% fail on Other components
        • 0.70% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.70% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.70% fail on Power steering
      • 0.70% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 9.1% fail on Tyres
    • 5.6% fail on Condition
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Size/type
  • 7.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.70% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.70% fail on Tank
  • 6.3% fail on Suspension (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Shackle (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Anchor (23 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Securing bolts
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.70% fail on Axles
      • 0.70% fail on King pins
  • 6.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.2% fail on Body condition
    • 1.4% fail on Body security (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Load security
      • 0.70% fail on Hinged tailboard
  • 3.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.70% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.70% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.70% fail on Requirements