Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Isuzu NKR MOT Results

Registered in 2006
54.5% pass rate
from 191 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu NKR is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (190% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 7.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Switch
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.52% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.1% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (25 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (29 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Main beam tell-tale (61 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.6% fail on Horn
      • 0.52% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.52% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.0% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.52% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.52% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.52% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.52% fail on Switch
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (200% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.52% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.52% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt
          • 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.52% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.52% fail on Lever
    • 1.0% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.52% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 16% fail on Visibility (62% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 10% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Condition of glass (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Windscreen (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on View to rear
      • 1.6% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Suspension (44% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.1% fail on Axles (20 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on King pins (256 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.52% fail on Springs
      • 0.52% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.52% fail on Leaf spring
    • 0.52% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 9.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Body
      • 1.0% fail on Other body component
      • 0.52% fail on Panel
    • 1.6% fail on Load security (18 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Dropside (76 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Other dropside component (191 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Dropside condition
        • 0.52% fail on Pillar
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.52% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.52% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.52% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.52% fail on Floor
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Size/type
  • 6.3% fail on Steering
    • 5.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.52% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.52% fail on Operation
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering
      • 0.52% fail on Rams
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
      • 1.0% fail on Requirements (13 times worse than other 2006 vans)
  • 2.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.52% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.52% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.52% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.52% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment