Isuzu NKR MOT Results
Registered in 200662.8% pass rate
from 180 tests in 2017
(24% better than other 2006 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu NKR is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 12% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
5.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 5.6% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.56% fail on Switch
-
5.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.0% fail on Individual lamps
-
5.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.3% fail on
Position lamps
(61% better than other 2006 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.56% fail on Front lamps
- 1.7% fail on Battery
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.56% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.2% fail on Washers
- 4.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.1% fail on Mirrors
- 0.56% fail on Windscreen
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(42% better than other 2006 vans)
-
6.1% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.8% fail on Front wheels
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.56% fail on Brake imbalance
-
2.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.8% fail on
Components
- 1.7% fail on Pipes
- 1.1% fail on Valves
- 0.56% fail on Hoses
-
2.8% fail on
Components
-
1.1% fail on
Hub components
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
-
0.56% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.56% fail on
Pedal
- 0.56% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.56% fail on
Pedal
- 0.56% fail on Restricted movement
-
6.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.1% fail on Tank
- 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension
(69% better than other 2006 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.8% fail on Condition
-
1.7% fail on
Axles
(45 times worse than other 2006 vans)
- 1.7% fail on King pins (194 times worse than other 2006 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.56% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.56% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.56% fail on Front suspension joints
-
2.8% fail on
Shock absorbers
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.2% fail on Condition
-
4.4% fail on
Steering
-
3.3% fail on
Steering system
- 2.8% fail on Track rod end
- 0.56% fail on Steering arm
- 1.1% fail on Steering operation (7 times worse than other 2006 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Power steering
- 0.56% fail on Operation
- 0.56% fail on Drive system
-
3.3% fail on
Steering system
-
3.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.2% fail on Body condition
-
1.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.7% fail on Chassis
-
1.1% fail on
Load security
(15 times worse than other 2006 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Hinged tailboard (157 times worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Dropside
-
2.8% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate
-
1.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.56% fail on Requirements
- 0.56% fail on Condition
- 0.56% fail on Attachment
-
1.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.56% fail on
Towbars
- 0.56% fail on Towbar