MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » NKR » 2009

Isuzu NKR MOT Results

Registered in 2009
54.1% pass rate
from 74 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu NKR is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 9.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.4% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 9.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
    • 6.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.4% fail on Lever
  • 14% fail on Visibility
    • 11% fail on Washers (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.1% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Ball joint (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Axles (53 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on King pins (709 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.1% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 1.4% fail on Other body component
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Size/type
  • 5.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 1.4% fail on Particulate filter
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Registration plates (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Drag link end
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.4% fail on Attachment