LDV Maxus MOT Results

Registered in 2005
49.5% pass rate
from 768 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Maxus is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Brakes (62% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (92% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 9.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 6.5% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 6.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 8.7% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 8.7% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 7.3% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 8.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 8.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.39% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 10% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Load sensing valves (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.65% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.65% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.39% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.13% fail on Lever
        • 0.13% fail on Linkage
        • 0.13% fail on Pivot
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal
      • 0.26% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.52% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.39% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.13% fail on Servos
    • 0.52% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.39% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.39% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic braking system
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.26% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Servos
  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 9.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.3% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Horn
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators (49% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type (49% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Individual direction indicators (69% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on Switch
    • 1.6% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (14 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (16 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.91% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.78% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.65% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.26% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.26% fail on Switch
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (48% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.78% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.39% fail on Springs (90% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.13% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.13% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 0.39% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.39% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.39% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Visibility (38% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers
    • 6.8% fail on Washers (47% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.0% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.52% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.3% fail on Transmission
      • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.1% fail on Joints
        • 0.26% fail on Drive shaft (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.0% fail on Body
      • 0.65% fail on Other body component
      • 0.39% fail on Panel
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 0.52% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
        • 0.26% fail on Hinge (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
        • 0.13% fail on Hinge
        • 0.13% fail on Catch
    • 0.78% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.65% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Seats
      • 0.39% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.26% fail on Load security
      • 0.13% fail on Loading door
      • 0.13% fail on Access panel
  • 7.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (75% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (90% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Compression ignition (97% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.52% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.91% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Size/type
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
    • 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.3% fail on Steering (49% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.13% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
    • 0.13% fail on Steering play
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.91% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment