Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

LDV Maxus MOT Results

Registered in 2005
49.9% pass rate
from 1,077 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Maxus is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Brakes (61% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (82% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 7.3% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.093% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.093% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 8.8% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 8.7% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 7.6% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.19% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 8.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (41% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 8.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (43% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.37% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.19% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.093% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.093% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.46% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 11% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Load sensing valves (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.37% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.093% fail on Rod
        • 0.093% fail on Cable
        • 0.093% fail on Lever
        • 0.093% fail on Linkage
        • 0.093% fail on Relay lever
    • 2.2% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Valves (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Reservoirs (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.093% fail on Servos
    • 0.93% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.65% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
    • 0.37% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.093% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.093% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.093% fail on Servos
    • 0.093% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.093% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.093% fail on Additional braking device
  • 27% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 9.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Switch (20 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Electrical equipment (74% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Horn
      • 1.9% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.093% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 4.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.093% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.093% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (57% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (57% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (58% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.093% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.0% fail on Rear reflectors (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (93% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (37% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.56% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.2% fail on Shock absorbers (85% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Other suspension component (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Springs (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.84% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover (59 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.37% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.093% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 13% fail on Visibility (30% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Washers (44% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Bonnet (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on View to rear
      • 1.2% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.56% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.56% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.56% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.1% fail on Transmission
      • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.3% fail on Joints
        • 0.28% fail on Drive shaft (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Bearing housing (15 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.093% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.093% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.093% fail on Joints
    • 2.0% fail on Body (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Panel (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Other body component
    • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.5% fail on Doors (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's door (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.84% fail on Hinge (34 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Door condition
        • 0.093% fail on Catch
      • 0.28% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Hinge (49 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.093% fail on Door condition
      • 0.28% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.28% fail on Door condition
    • 0.93% fail on Chassis
      • 0.93% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.74% fail on Seats
      • 0.56% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.19% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.65% fail on Exhaust system (81% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.37% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.093% fail on Hose
      • 0.093% fail on Pipe
    • 0.28% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.28% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.28% fail on Undertray (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Towbar
      • 0.19% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.19% fail on Load security
      • 0.19% fail on Loading door
    • 0.19% fail on Cabs
      • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.093% fail on Floor
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (98% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 8.9% fail on Compression ignition (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 6.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.28% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.093% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.093% fail on Particulate filter
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.093% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.93% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.65% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.093% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Size/type
  • 4.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
      • 0.093% fail on Requirements
    • 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.093% fail on Airbags
      • 0.093% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 3.4% fail on Steering (46% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components (47% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end (48% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.093% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.28% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Operation
    • 0.28% fail on Power steering
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
    • 0.28% fail on Steering coupling (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Universal joint (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Steering play
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.65% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.56% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on Condition
  • 0.093% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.093% fail on Speedometer