LDV Maxus MOT Results
Registered in 200549.5% pass rate
from 768 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Maxus is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Brakes
(62% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
20% fail on
Brake performance
(92% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
9.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
9.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 6.5% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 6.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
9.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
8.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(120% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
8.7% fail on
Rbt
(120% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 7.3% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.13% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
8.7% fail on
Rbt
(120% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
8.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(39% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 8.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.39% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.7% fail on
Rbt
- 0.91% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 10% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Load sensing valves (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs
-
0.65% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.65% fail on Brake pads
-
0.39% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.13% fail on Lever
- 0.13% fail on Linkage
- 0.13% fail on Pivot
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.52% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.26% fail on Pedal
- 0.26% fail on Hand lever
-
0.52% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.39% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.13% fail on Servos
- 0.52% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.39% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.39% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(81% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.13% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.26% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.13% fail on Operation
- 0.13% fail on Servos
-
20% fail on
Brake performance
(92% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
25% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(21% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
9.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
9.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 9.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
9.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 6.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
3.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.3% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.91% fail on Horn
- 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
(49% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
(49% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Individual direction indicators (69% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.13% fail on Switch
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
(49% better than other 2005 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(14 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (16 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.91% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.78% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.65% fail on Position lamp
- 0.13% fail on All position lamps
-
0.26% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.26% fail on Switch
-
9.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
18% fail on
Suspension
- 7.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.3% fail on Ball joint
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(48% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.65% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.52% fail on Linkage
- 0.39% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.78% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.52% fail on Ball joint
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.39% fail on
Springs
(90% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.13% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.13% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
-
0.39% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.39% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.39% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
14% fail on
Visibility
(38% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 6.9% fail on Wipers
- 6.8% fail on Washers (47% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
View to rear
- 1.3% fail on Mirrors
- 1.0% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.52% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.52% fail on Windscreen
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
5.3% fail on
Transmission
-
5.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 5.1% fail on Joints
- 0.26% fail on Drive shaft (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
5.3% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.4% fail on
Chassis
- 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.0% fail on
Body
- 0.65% fail on Other body component
- 0.39% fail on Panel
-
1.0% fail on
Doors
-
0.52% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.26% fail on Door condition
- 0.26% fail on Hinge (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.52% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.26% fail on Door condition
- 0.13% fail on Hinge
- 0.13% fail on Catch
-
0.52% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.78% fail on Bumpers
- 0.65% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.39% fail on
Seats
- 0.39% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.26% fail on
Load security
- 0.13% fail on Loading door
- 0.13% fail on Access panel
-
5.3% fail on
Transmission
-
7.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(75% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
7.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(90% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
6.1% fail on
Compression ignition
(97% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
1.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.52% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.1% fail on
Compression ignition
(97% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.91% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
7.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(90% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Tyres
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 0.39% fail on Size/type
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.13% fail on Requirements
- 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.3% fail on
Steering
(49% better than other 2005 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint
-
0.13% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
-
0.13% fail on
Power steering
- 0.13% fail on Operation
-
0.13% fail on
Steering play
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
-
2.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.91% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.91% fail on Registration plates
-
0.39% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.39% fail on Attachment