Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

LDV Maxus MOT Results

Registered in 2006
48.0% pass rate
from 2,502 tests in 2017
(6.8% worse than other 2006 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Maxus is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (8.9% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.20% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Tell tale (15 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Switch (30 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (29% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (28% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Battery (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.040% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.040% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.040% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.040% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.040% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.040% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.1% fail on Direction indicators (38% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Flashing type (38% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Individual lamps (46% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Horn (52% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.20% fail on Lamp
      • 0.12% fail on Switch
      • 0.040% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 29% fail on Brakes (59% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (99% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 10% fail on Parking brake performance (78% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Rear wheels (100% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Front wheels (140% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance (95% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems (82% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 12% fail on Components (91% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 9.3% fail on Pipes (87% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.80% fail on Hoses
        • 0.28% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.12% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.040% fail on Servos
      • 0.28% fail on Leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.080% fail on Operation
    • 4.4% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Fitment
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.96% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.12% fail on Wheel cylinder
      • 0.080% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.72% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.72% fail on Pedal
        • 0.56% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.28% fail on Pivot (16 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Cable
      • 0.080% fail on Lever
      • 0.080% fail on Relay lever (18 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Linkage
    • 0.52% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.12% fail on ABS (91% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.080% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.080% fail on Components
        • 0.040% fail on Pipes
        • 0.040% fail on Valves
  • 19% fail on Suspension (12% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Drive shafts (35% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Front drive shafts (37% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 4.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (33% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Drive shafts (10 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.040% fail on Universal joint
    • 4.2% fail on Front suspension joints (95% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Wheel bearings (98% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Rear (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Front
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms (25% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (27% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (46% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (40% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (64% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.080% fail on Condition
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.76% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Component mounting (79% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Spring mounting (82% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.52% fail on Macpherson strut (180% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Leaf springs (85% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.040% fail on General condition
    • 0.040% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.040% fail on Location
    • 0.040% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.040% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.040% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.040% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 15% fail on Driver's view of the road (41% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Washers (86% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.92% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.040% fail on Drivers view
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Size/type
    • 0.080% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
      • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas (89% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Installation check
        • 0.040% fail on Anchorage's
    • 1.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.080% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.040% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 3.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.6% fail on Doors (130% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Passengers front (150% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.080% fail on Emergency exits
      • 0.040% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (Class 5)
    • 1.4% fail on Body condition
    • 0.32% fail on Body security (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Seats
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers
    • 0.24% fail on Speedometer (6 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Vehicle structure (83% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Chassis (83% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.080% fail on Load security
      • 0.040% fail on Access panel
      • 0.040% fail on Loading door
    • 0.040% fail on Engine mountings
  • 3.8% fail on Steering (34% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Steering system (45% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end (54% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.32% fail on Free play
        • 0.32% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack (76% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
        • 0.12% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.68% fail on Steering control (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Steering coupling (9 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Universal joint (9 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Steering column
    • 0.32% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.080% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.080% fail on Other components
    • 0.20% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.040% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (44% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions (86% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system (64% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on System
      • 0.080% fail on Cap
      • 0.040% fail on Pipe
    • 0.32% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.32% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
  • 0.080% fail on Towbars
    • 0.080% fail on Towbar