Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

LDV Maxus MOT Results

Registered in 2006
47.7% pass rate
from 2,133 tests in 2020
(7.6% worse than other 2006 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Maxus is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Brakes (55% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (78% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
          • 7.5% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 9.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (50% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 9.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (51% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.047% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 8.1% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 8.0% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2006 vans)
          • 6.6% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2006 vans)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (95% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.094% fail on Decelerometer (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
          • 0.094% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.094% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.094% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.094% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.047% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 10% fail on Rigid brake pipes (99% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (49% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.094% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (110% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.56% fail on Cable
        • 0.33% fail on Linkage (10 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Pivot (13 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.047% fail on Lever
        • 0.047% fail on Relay lever
    • 3.0% fail on Load sensing valves (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.70% fail on Pedal
      • 0.47% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.70% fail on Hydraulic systems (170% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Valves (8 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Reservoirs (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.52% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.047% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
    • 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.28% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (83% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system (85% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.19% fail on Air and vacuum systems (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Operation (22 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Leaks
      • 0.047% fail on Servos
    • 0.047% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.047% fail on Other components
  • 27% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (17% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 8.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Switch (22 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.047% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.19% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.047% fail on Switch
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (24% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.4% fail on Electrical equipment (70% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Horn (51% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.094% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.66% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (6 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (7 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
    • 0.047% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.047% fail on Reversing lamp switch
  • 18% fail on Suspension (14% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (85% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes (89% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (41% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.47% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (71% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes (73% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover (76% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (86% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings (89% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (35% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers (61% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Other suspension component (130% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.094% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.56% fail on Macpherson strut (170% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.42% fail on Springs (89% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.094% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.094% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.047% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.047% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Visibility (31% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers (26% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Washers (41% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.98% fail on View to rear
      • 0.98% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.89% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Driver's view (160% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.33% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (18% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Transmission
      • 4.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.2% fail on Joints
        • 0.23% fail on Drive shaft (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Prop shafts (89% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.094% fail on Joints
    • 1.7% fail on Doors (160% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Other passenger's door (190% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Door condition (180% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.094% fail on Catch (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Driver's door (200% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Hinge (10 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
        • 0.047% fail on Pillar
      • 0.38% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.33% fail on Door condition
        • 0.047% fail on Catch
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Body
      • 0.61% fail on Other body component
      • 0.42% fail on Panel
      • 0.094% fail on Body condition
      • 0.047% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 1.1% fail on Bumpers (190% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Chassis (66% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Chassis condition (66% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Exhaust system (82% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Seats
      • 0.28% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.094% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.28% fail on Fuel system (64% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Hose
      • 0.094% fail on Pipe
      • 0.094% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.23% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.23% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.19% fail on Load security
      • 0.19% fail on Loading door (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.047% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.047% fail on Carrier
    • 0.047% fail on Undertray
  • 7.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (33% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (44% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Compression ignition (56% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (90% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.42% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.19% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.047% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.75% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.56% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.047% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.047% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.66% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.61% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.047% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.56% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas (80% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Requirements
      • 0.094% fail on Attachment
      • 0.094% fail on Pre-tensioners (15 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.094% fail on Airbags
      • 0.094% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 3.3% fail on Steering (45% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components (52% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end (53% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.047% fail on Other components
        • 0.047% fail on Steering component
      • 0.047% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.42% fail on Steering coupling (8 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Universal joint (7 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.42% fail on Steering play
      • 0.42% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering (68% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Operation
      • 0.047% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.047% fail on Other components
    • 0.094% fail on Steering gear (88% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Steering rack (87% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.047% fail on Steering column
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.19% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Speedometer (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.047% fail on Speed limiter
      • 0.047% fail on Speed limiter plate
  • 0.19% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Emergency exits (8 times worse than other 2006 vans)
  • 0.047% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.047% fail on Condition