LDV Maxus MOT Results

Registered in 2009
54.1% pass rate
from 508 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Maxus is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Brakes (58% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 7.1% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.20% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.59% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 9.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.0% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.79% fail on Hydraulic systems (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.20% fail on Valves
    • 0.59% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.59% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (17 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
    • 0.20% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.20% fail on Leaks
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp (69% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (99% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (99% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 4.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Electrical equipment (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Battery(ies) (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Horn
      • 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.98% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.98% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.59% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.59% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.59% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (11 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (16 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.39% fail on Switch
    • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 14% fail on Visibility (56% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Washers (80% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on View to rear
      • 0.98% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.20% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.39% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.39% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on Driver's view
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (89% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (69% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.59% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.20% fail on Springs
      • 0.20% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.20% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
    • 0.20% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.20% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.7% fail on Transmission
      • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.5% fail on Joints
        • 0.20% fail on Bearing housing
    • 1.8% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Panel
      • 0.20% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Passenger's seat (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.59% fail on Chassis
      • 0.59% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.59% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
      • 0.20% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Tank
    • 0.20% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.20% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Bracket
    • 0.20% fail on Load security
      • 0.20% fail on Dropside
        • 0.20% fail on Dropside condition
  • 9.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 4.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (72% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.79% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.59% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.0% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.39% fail on Airbags (10 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Drivers airbag (11 times worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Size/type (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 2.4% fail on Steering (55% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components (71% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end (69% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering
      • 0.39% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.20% fail on Steering column
    • 0.20% fail on Steering play
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment
  • 0.20% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.20% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.20% fail on Retractable steps