MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Suzuki » Carry » 2002

Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2002
51.5% pass rate
from 680 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (90% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.9% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Springs
      • 0.88% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.74% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.15% fail on Mounting
      • 0.74% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.15% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.59% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.44% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.59% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.59% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.15% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (20% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators (51% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type (51% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (66% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Electrical equipment (82% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Horn (73% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system (67% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 3.2% fail on Chassis
      • 3.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.88% fail on Body
      • 0.59% fail on Other body component
      • 0.29% fail on Panel
      • 0.15% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.59% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.29% fail on Tank
      • 0.29% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.44% fail on Cabs
      • 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.15% fail on Load security
      • 0.15% fail on Loading door
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.15% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
    • 0.15% fail on Floor
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
  • 9.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 9.6% fail on Spark ignition (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Non catalyst emissions (12 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 9.3% fail on Brakes (51% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance (69% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (59% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (57% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (51% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (78% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (63% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.88% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Rbt (sp) (84% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.74% fail on Rbt
          • 0.74% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.15% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.15% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.74% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.74% fail on Lever
    • 0.29% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.29% fail on Load sensing valves (87% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.15% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 8.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers (59% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on View to rear
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Tread depth (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (82% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Steering linkage components (87% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.44% fail on Steering gear (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.88% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.88% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment