MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Suzuki » Carry » 2002

Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2002
51.6% pass rate
from 935 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (84% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 7.1% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.3% fail on Springs (63% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.32% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.11% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.11% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.53% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.32% fail on Coil springs (82% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Coil spring (81% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.75% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.32% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers (86% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.11% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (22% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.11% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators (45% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type (45% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 2.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (45% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (45% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (44% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (59% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Electrical equipment (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.32% fail on Horn (86% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.11% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (20% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (60% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 2.2% fail on Chassis
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.53% fail on Towbar
      • 0.43% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.11% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.53% fail on Body
      • 0.32% fail on Other body component
      • 0.11% fail on Body condition
      • 0.11% fail on Panel
    • 0.43% fail on Boot lid (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Boot lid condition (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Seats
      • 0.32% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system (80% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.21% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.21% fail on Carrier
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
      • 0.11% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.21% fail on Cabs
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Load security
      • 0.11% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.11% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 11% fail on Brakes (44% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.6% fail on Brake performance (63% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (49% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (48% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (48% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (80% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (80% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.96% fail on Service brake imbalance (67% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance (64% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt (63% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance (64% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.53% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (91% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp) (91% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (52% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.32% fail on Brake discs and drums (76% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Brake discs (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.11% fail on Linkage
    • 0.53% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.53% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.32% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.11% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 9.7% fail on Tyres (54% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Tread depth (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 8.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on View to rear
      • 0.75% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.32% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view
  • 8.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (56% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (90% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Spark ignition (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (12 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Compression ignition (94% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (85% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.11% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
        • 0.11% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.32% fail on Steering gear (77% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Steering rack (76% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.11% fail on Steering column
    • 0.11% fail on Steering play
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.96% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.96% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment