MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Suzuki » Carry » 2003

Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2003
52.0% pass rate
from 1,286 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (69% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 9.0% fail on Suspension arms (38% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover (72% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Springs (61% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Coil springs (64% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Coil spring (68% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.078% fail on Mounting
      • 0.62% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.078% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.078% fail on Leaf spring
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (78% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joints (91% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.078% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.70% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.078% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.31% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Sub-frames (79% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (25% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 8.9% fail on Stop lamp (35% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (41% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (41% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (41% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps (52% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Position lamp (55% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.078% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (63% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (63% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Individual direction indicators (68% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.078% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (79% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment (65% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Horn (56% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.078% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.078% fail on Switch
    • 0.078% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (22% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system (73% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.6% fail on Chassis
      • 2.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.62% fail on Body
      • 0.31% fail on Panel
      • 0.23% fail on Other body component
      • 0.16% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.39% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.31% fail on Carrier
      • 0.078% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.31% fail on Towbar
      • 0.16% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.16% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.31% fail on Boot lid (10 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Boot lid condition (12 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Floor
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system (84% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Tank
      • 0.078% fail on Pipe
    • 0.16% fail on Doors (83% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.078% fail on Transmission
      • 0.078% fail on Belts
    • 0.078% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.078% fail on Bracket
    • 0.078% fail on Load security
      • 0.078% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.078% fail on Tailgate condition
      • 0.078% fail on Dropside
        • 0.078% fail on Dropside condition
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (90% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 10% fail on Spark ignition (11 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 5.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (11 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (12 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested (18 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Non catalyst emissions (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.078% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.078% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.54% fail on Compression ignition (86% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.16% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.078% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.078% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.078% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 10% fail on Brakes (47% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance (71% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (54% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (53% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (57% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (62% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.86% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (86% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (71% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.62% fail on Parking brake performance (67% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.078% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.078% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (63% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads (57% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.70% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.078% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.23% fail on Lever
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.078% fail on Pedal
      • 0.078% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.078% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.078% fail on Valves
    • 0.16% fail on Load sensing valves (94% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.078% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.078% fail on Other components
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres (35% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Tread depth (87% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (50% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 8.6% fail on Visibility (21% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers (44% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear (81% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors (81% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (46% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
      • 0.078% fail on Attachment
    • 0.54% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (69% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (81% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.31% fail on Steering play
      • 0.31% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.16% fail on Steering gear (87% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack (87% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering column
    • 0.078% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.078% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.078% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 0.078% fail on Condition
    • 0.078% fail on Hubs
  • 0.078% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.078% fail on Anchorages