Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2003
54.2% pass rate
from 1,415 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 2003 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (18% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 11% fail on Prescribed areas (43% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Component mounting (100% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.28% fail on Subframe mounting (74% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Suspension arms (37% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (39% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Front
      • 0.49% fail on Rear
    • 0.92% fail on Coil springs (68% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Location
    • 0.57% fail on Anti-roll bars (91% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (75% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (95% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Leaf springs (85% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Condition
      • 0.071% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.071% fail on Anchor
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.071% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.071% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.071% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.071% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.071% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.071% fail on Condition
  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (37% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Stop lamp (26% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps (58% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Front lamps (77% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (77% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (60% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (60% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps (61% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.21% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (54% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Fog lamp (53% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Horn (49% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.071% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.071% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Brakes (38% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (38% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Components (36% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.64% fail on Hoses
        • 0.35% fail on Valves (88% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Leaks
    • 5.4% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear wheels (54% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Front wheels (51% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.78% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance (95% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.64% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.78% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.071% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.071% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 9.0% fail on Tread depth (70% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Size/type
    • 0.14% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (37% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (49% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Emissions (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system (83% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Cap
      • 0.071% fail on Tank
  • 9.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (27% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.35% fail on Windscreen (72% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Mirrors (76% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 5.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (25% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Body condition
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis
    • 0.28% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers
      • 0.071% fail on Passengers
    • 0.21% fail on Load security
      • 0.21% fail on Access panel (14 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Doors (87% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.071% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
  • 3.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (45% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
      • 0.071% fail on Requirements
      • 0.071% fail on Attachment
    • 0.42% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (76% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (74% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (85% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Steering system (90% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Free play
        • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.14% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.21% fail on Steering control
      • 0.14% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.071% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.071% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering (77% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Electronic power steering (28 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.071% fail on Operation
    • 0.14% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.85% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.28% fail on Towbars
    • 0.28% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment