Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2004
56.9% pass rate
from 1,291 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension (15% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (66% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.7% fail on Ball joint (36% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover (74% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Springs (63% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.54% fail on Coil springs (77% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Coil spring (80% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Leaf springs (81% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.077% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.62% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.077% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.54% fail on Anti-roll bars (91% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes (75% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joints (92% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.23% fail on Sub-frames (74% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.077% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.077% fail on Axles
      • 0.077% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.077% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.077% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.077% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.077% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.077% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (33% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.077% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (44% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (44% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (44% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators (58% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type (58% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Individual direction indicators (64% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (75% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.62% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.62% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Electrical equipment (78% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Horn (76% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.077% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition (13 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 6.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (13 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (19 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.39% fail on Compression ignition (88% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.077% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.077% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.077% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.077% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.15% fail on Fluid leaks (83% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.077% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 11% fail on Brakes (40% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance (66% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (52% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (63% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance (88% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (74% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.077% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.077% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.077% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.39% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (94% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Rbt (sp) (94% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (46% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.077% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.46% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.46% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.077% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.077% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.31% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.23% fail on Lever
    • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Valves
      • 0.077% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.15% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.15% fail on Load sensing valves (85% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.077% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.077% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.077% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.077% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.077% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (27% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system (51% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.9% fail on Chassis
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.54% fail on Body
      • 0.39% fail on Panel
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component
    • 0.31% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.077% fail on Tank
      • 0.077% fail on Hose
      • 0.077% fail on Pipe
      • 0.077% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.15% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.23% fail on Boot lid (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Boot lid condition (13 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Load security
      • 0.077% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.077% fail on Tailgate condition
      • 0.077% fail on Access panel
    • 0.15% fail on Floor
    • 0.077% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.077% fail on Carrier
    • 0.077% fail on Transmission
      • 0.077% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.077% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.077% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.077% fail on Bracket
    • 0.077% fail on Cabs
      • 0.077% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.077% fail on View to rear
      • 0.077% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Size/type
  • 3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
      • 0.077% fail on Attachment
    • 0.31% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.077% fail on Airbags
      • 0.077% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Steering linkage components (81% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.39% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.15% fail on Steering gear (88% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Operation
      • 0.077% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.15% fail on Steering play
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.93% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.93% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.077% fail on Condition
    • 0.077% fail on Attachment
  • 0.077% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.077% fail on Speedometer