Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2004
55.0% pass rate
from 1,695 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (40% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Position lamps (52% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Front lamps (67% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.059% fail on Switch
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (65% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators (61% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type (61% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps (56% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Side repeaters (67% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Switch
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (61% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Fog lamp (60% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.53% fail on Horn (74% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.059% fail on Battery
    • 0.059% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.059% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.059% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.059% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.059% fail on Switch
  • 19% fail on Suspension (25% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 8.7% fail on Prescribed areas (30% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Component mounting (95% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting (58% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Subframe mounting (68% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Suspension arms (39% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (40% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 3.4% fail on Front suspension joints (42% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front
      • 0.71% fail on Rear
    • 0.94% fail on Anti-roll bars (86% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (64% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (94% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment
      • 0.059% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.59% fail on Coil springs (78% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Location
    • 0.24% fail on Leaf springs (74% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.12% fail on Shackle
    • 0.12% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.059% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.059% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.059% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.059% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Brakes (39% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.8% fail on Components
        • 6.3% fail on Pipes
        • 0.53% fail on Hoses
        • 0.12% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.059% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.059% fail on Valves
      • 0.41% fail on Leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance (70% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear wheels (68% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels (56% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance (87% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs (63% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.059% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.41% fail on Parking brake (68% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake control components (83% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal (83% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.059% fail on Linkage
      • 0.059% fail on Cable
    • 0.059% fail on ABS
  • 12% fail on Tyres (38% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 9.9% fail on Tread depth (93% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition (38% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
    • 0.059% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.6% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (50% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Windscreen (55% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.059% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (61% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Emissions
    • 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system (89% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Tank
      • 0.059% fail on Cap
  • 3.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (42% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Body condition (38% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis
    • 0.35% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.24% fail on Load security
      • 0.18% fail on Tailgate (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.12% fail on Body security
    • 0.059% fail on Doors
      • 0.059% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.059% fail on Seats
      • 0.059% fail on Drivers
  • 3.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (44% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (79% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (81% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (80% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Steering system (87% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Free play
        • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.12% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.65% fail on Steering control (170% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Steering column (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.18% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.12% fail on Steering lock (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.059% fail on Power steering
      • 0.059% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.35% fail on Registration plates and VIN (70% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plate (70% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
    • 0.059% fail on Condition
  • 0.12% fail on Towbars
    • 0.059% fail on Towbar
    • 0.059% fail on Vehicle structure