MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Suzuki » Carry » 2004
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2004
55.3% pass rate
from 1,659 tests in 2020
(11% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension (16% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 9.2% fail on Suspension arms (31% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Ball joint (88% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover (72% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Suspension arm
    • 7.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Springs (60% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Coil springs (66% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.72% fail on Coil spring (68% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.060% fail on Mounting
      • 0.54% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.18% fail on Leaf springs (78% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.060% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.060% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.060% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.84% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.72% fail on Anti-roll bars (89% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joints (94% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.060% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.36% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames (76% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.060% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (52% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps (49% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Position lamp (50% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (47% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (47% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (46% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (74% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Direction indicators (72% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Flashing type (72% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Individual direction indicators (66% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Electrical equipment (70% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Horn (72% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Battery(ies) (74% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.12% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.060% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.060% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.060% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.060% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 6.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (16 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Non catalyst emissions (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Compression ignition (83% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested (84% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.060% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.060% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.18% fail on Fluid leaks (82% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.060% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 11% fail on Brakes (40% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance (62% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (39% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (38% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance (33% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance (57% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (71% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.96% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.72% fail on Service brake imbalance (62% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance (83% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (87% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt (75% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.060% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.060% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (35% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.060% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.30% fail on Brake discs and drums (76% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Brake discs (85% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.48% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.36% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.36% fail on Lever
    • 0.18% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.060% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.060% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.060% fail on Valves
    • 0.12% fail on Load sensing valves (90% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.060% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.060% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.060% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.060% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (30% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system (39% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.060% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.060% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.90% fail on Body
      • 0.42% fail on Panel
      • 0.42% fail on Other body component
      • 0.060% fail on Body condition
    • 0.36% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.36% fail on Carrier (200% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.060% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.18% fail on Towbar
      • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.060% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.18% fail on Floor
    • 0.18% fail on Cabs
      • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system (85% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Bracket
    • 0.12% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.060% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.060% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.060% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.060% fail on Doors
      • 0.060% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.060% fail on Door condition
  • 9.0% fail on Tyres (29% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Tread depth (79% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 8.1% fail on Visibility (24% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on View to rear
      • 0.48% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.18% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (61% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts (51% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (44% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (83% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.060% fail on Airbags
      • 0.060% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.84% fail on Steering (88% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.18% fail on Steering play
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.12% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.060% fail on Flexible coupling
      • 0.060% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.060% fail on Steering column
  • 0.60% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
  • 0.060% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.060% fail on Speedometer