Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2006
53.4% pass rate
from 58 tests in 2020
(6.7% better than other 2006 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (14% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 16% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 12% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (48% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (190% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 14% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 14% fail on Spark ignition (16 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 8.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (13 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 6.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (45 times worse than other 2006 vans)
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (42% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Stop lamp (6.3% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators (12% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type (12% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (0.36% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (86% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (89% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
  • 8.6% fail on Brakes (51% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (32% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (8.3% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (55% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads (58% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
  • 3.4% fail on Visibility (65% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers (31% better than other 2006 vans)
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth