Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2006
59.0% pass rate
from 78 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.6% fail on Horn
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.3% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.3% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.3% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 10% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Bonnet
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.1% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.8% fail on Springs
      • 2.6% fail on Leaf springs
        • 2.6% fail on Leaf spring
        • 1.3% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (140% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition (13 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 7.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (52 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 12% fail on Tyres
    • 9.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Size/type
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 9.0% fail on Brakes
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 6.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas