Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 1992
58.8% pass rate
from 233 tests in 2020
(9.0% better than other 1992 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (4.1% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (51% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (51% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (50% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Switch (7.8% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp (5.7% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators (32% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type (32% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (0.44% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.4% fail on Electrical equipment (23% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Battery(ies) (24% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Horn (51% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (25% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (19% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (7.6% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (69% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (29% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.43% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.43% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (20% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust system (45% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Transmission (24% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts (14% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 5.2% fail on Joints (14% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Prop shafts (160% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.43% fail on Joints
    • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (19% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (19% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Body (43% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Body condition
      • 0.43% fail on Panel
      • 0.43% fail on Other body component
    • 0.86% fail on Chassis (66% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Chassis condition (66% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Seats (23% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Driver's seat (61% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Pipe
    • 0.43% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.43% fail on Load security
      • 0.43% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.43% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.43% fail on Doors
      • 0.43% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.43% fail on Door condition
    • 0.43% fail on Cabs
      • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Suspension (19% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms (2.9% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Ball joint (71% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Suspension arm (5 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint dust cover (64% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (99% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes (120% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (73% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings (3.3% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers (61% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Springs (45% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Leaf springs (84% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Axles
      • 0.43% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.43% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.43% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
  • 12% fail on Brakes (23% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance (45% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (60% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (59% better than other 1992 vans)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 1992 vans)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (59% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 1992 vans)
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 1992 vans)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.86% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested (140% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (52% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.86% fail on Parking brake performance (28% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.43% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.43% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (24% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (16% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.43% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.43% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.43% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.43% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.43% fail on Pivot
    • 0.86% fail on Load sensing valves (37% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.43% fail on Pedal
    • 0.43% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.43% fail on Lever
    • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.43% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.43% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.43% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 7.3% fail on Steering (32% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Steering linkage components (100% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Track rod end (82% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Intermediate drop arm (5 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Drag link end
    • 1.3% fail on Steering play (3 times worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Steering box (11 times worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Power steering (7.6% worse than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Operation
      • 0.43% fail on Pump
    • 0.43% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.43% fail on Steering box
  • 5.6% fail on Visibility (48% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers (46% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Washers (54% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (31% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (28% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Compression ignition (92% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (84% worse than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.86% fail on Spark ignition (78% better than other 1992 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.43% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.86% fail on Fluid leaks (7.8% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.43% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (20% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts (20% better than other 1992 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas (10% worse than other 1992 vans)
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres (19% better than other 1992 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (37% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Condition
  • 0.86% fail on Road Wheels (160% worse than other 1992 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1992 vans)
  • 0.43% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plates