Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results
Registered in 199555.9% pass rate
from 245 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
6.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 6.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
6.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp
-
0.82% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.82% fail on Position lamp
- 0.41% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.41% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.41% fail on Horn
-
6.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
6.9% fail on
Rbt
- 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.41% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.41% fail on Service brake performance
-
6.9% fail on
Rbt
-
4.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
4.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 4.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.41% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.6% fail on
Rbt
- 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
7.3% fail on
Service brake performance
- 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.82% fail on Brake pads
- 0.41% fail on Brake linings
-
0.82% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.82% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.82% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.41% fail on Master cylinder
- 1.2% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.82% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.82% fail on Pedal
- 0.41% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 4.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.7% fail on
Body
(2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Panel (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Other body component
-
1.2% fail on
Chassis
- 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.2% fail on
Transmission
-
1.2% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.82% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.41% fail on Joints
-
1.2% fail on
Prop shafts
-
1.2% fail on
Seats
- 1.2% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.41% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.41% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.41% fail on Pipe
-
0.41% fail on
Doors
-
0.41% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.41% fail on Door condition
-
0.41% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
4.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 8.2% fail on Washers
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 0.41% fail on Bonnet
-
9.4% fail on
Steering
-
7.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
(200% worse than other 1995 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Drag link end (22 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end
- 1.2% fail on Intermediate drop arm (17 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint
-
1.6% fail on
Steering play
(9 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Steering box (19 times worse than other 1995 vans)
-
0.82% fail on
Power steering
- 0.82% fail on Operation
-
0.41% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.41% fail on Steering box
- 0.41% fail on Steering column
-
7.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
(200% worse than other 1995 vans)
-
9.0% fail on
Suspension
(45% better than other 1995 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Springs
-
2.9% fail on
Leaf springs
(5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.41% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
- 0.82% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
2.9% fail on
Leaf springs
(5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (80% better than other 1995 vans)
- 0.82% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.82% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint
-
0.41% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint
-
0.41% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.41% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.3% fail on
Springs
-
4.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.41% fail on Condition
-
4.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 2.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.41% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.41% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.41% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
4.1% fail on
Compression ignition
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.0% fail on
Tyres
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.82% fail on Tread depth
-
1.2% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.2% fail on Registration plates