Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 1995
59.3% pass rate
from 774 tests in 2017
(17% better than other 1995 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (24% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 8.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 1.2% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.26% fail on Switch
    • 5.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (62% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (50% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (50% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.52% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (69% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (77% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.13% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.13% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.13% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.13% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Battery (60% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Horn (74% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.52% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.26% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.13% fail on Lamp
  • 18% fail on Suspension (21% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage condition (150% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Attachment
    • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts (83% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Front drive shafts (82% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (83% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.13% fail on Universal joint
        • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas (76% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Component mounting (78% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Spring mounting (68% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (54% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.9% fail on Front
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Leaf springs (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.90% fail on Shackle (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.13% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.13% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.78% fail on Axles (7 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Swivel joints/housing (11 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on General condition
    • 0.13% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Front wheels (48% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.26% fail on Brake operation
    • 7.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.2% fail on Components
        • 3.9% fail on Pipes
        • 1.6% fail on Valves
        • 1.4% fail on Hoses
        • 0.26% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.13% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.65% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Leaks
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads (95% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.26% fail on Wheel cylinder
      • 0.13% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.13% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.13% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.65% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.52% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (6 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.52% fail on Pedal
        • 0.52% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.26% fail on Cable
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage
    • 0.26% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.13% fail on ABS
  • 8.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.39% fail on Cap
      • 0.39% fail on System
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Pipe
  • 7.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (33% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.39% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.39% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.6% fail on Steering
    • 5.9% fail on Steering system
      • 1.7% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.78% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Steering pivot point (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Steering component (11 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Steering rack (69% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Free play
        • 0.26% fail on Steering box (5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.39% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.26% fail on Steering box (7 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering
      • 0.26% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
    • 0.26% fail on Steering control
      • 0.13% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.13% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (36% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure (57% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis (57% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
    • 0.13% fail on Body security
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers front
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (37% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Seat belts (37% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas (42% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
      • 0.26% fail on Requirements
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.39% fail on Towbars
    • 0.39% fail on Towbar (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment