Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 1995
57.3% pass rate
from 696 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (18% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (41% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (42% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 9.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (40% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Switch
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.14% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (60% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (60% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment (62% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.86% fail on Horn (72% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.3% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamps (79% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (78% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.57% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.6% fail on Transmission
      • 3.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.0% fail on Joints
      • 1.7% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.72% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.72% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.14% fail on Bearing housing
    • 2.3% fail on Body (120% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Panel
      • 1.1% fail on Other body component (170% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis (65% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition (64% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.72% fail on Doors
      • 0.43% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.43% fail on Door condition
      • 0.14% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
      • 0.14% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.29% fail on Pipe
      • 0.14% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.43% fail on Towbar
      • 0.14% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.14% fail on Safety device
      • 0.14% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.43% fail on Seats
      • 0.29% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.14% fail on Load security
      • 0.14% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.14% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.14% fail on Floor
    • 0.14% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.14% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 14% fail on Suspension (28% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.57% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover (76% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.72% fail on Linkage
      • 0.72% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 2.0% fail on Springs
      • 1.4% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Leaf spring (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 0.57% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.43% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.14% fail on Mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (82% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.0% fail on Axles (11 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Stub axle
      • 0.14% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.43% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (59% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (61% better than other 1995 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (62% better than other 1995 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (59% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.57% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.43% fail on Pivot (7 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Cable
        • 0.14% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.29% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.0% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.72% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.43% fail on Pedal
      • 0.29% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.43% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.43% fail on Lever
    • 0.43% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.14% fail on Valves
    • 0.29% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.14% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
        • 0.14% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.14% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.14% fail on Servos
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.14% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 8.9% fail on Steering (49% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Steering linkage components (170% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.7% fail on Drag link end (10 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Intermediate drop arm (13 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.14% fail on Other components
        • 0.14% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.72% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.57% fail on Steering rack (69% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Steering box
    • 0.57% fail on Power steering
      • 0.57% fail on Operation
    • 0.57% fail on Steering play
      • 0.57% fail on Steering box (8 times worse than other 1995 vans)
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility (29% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.29% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.29% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.14% fail on View to rear
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
      • 0.14% fail on Requirements
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.72% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.14% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.86% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.14% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.14% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.57% fail on Condition (69% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 0.72% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.72% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.57% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.57% fail on Attachment
  • 0.14% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.14% fail on Speedometer